Thanks - think I'll give sipXbridge a whirl. I notice that http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/SIP+Trunking has not been updated since April 2011. Are there changes I should be aware of?
On Jun 24, 2012, at 9:28 , Tony Graziano wrote: > Sipxbridge is just an option. A properly configured SBC works well too. It > absolutely depends on your requirements. > > On Jun 24, 2012 10:49 AM, "Kurt Albershardt" <[email protected]> wrote: > Given my past VoIP experiences (it's been a few years), I just was about to > ask why sipX would not support multiple NICs and then it hit me: While > multiple NICs make perfect sense in a B2BUA architecture, they really do not > for a pure SIP proxy design. > > Is sipXbridge still the preferred path for isolating sipX from the outside > world and avoiding NAT traversal? More particularly, in a "sipX behind > pfSense" configuration is it still a good way to link to the outside world? > > > thanks~ > > > > On Jun 23, 2012, at 10:59 , Tony Graziano wrote: > > > Therein lies your problem. At no time has multiple NIC's ever been > > supported or recommended. > > > > I would suggest you drop back down to one NIC. The issue you are having > > WILL reintroduce iteself as the system runs, I guarantee it.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
