Would it be better to discuss the blf/rls standards available to see if there is a more efficient standard for a wan environment and whether they are functionally possible. On Jul 11, 2012 8:49 AM, "Nathaniel Watkins" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are there any realistic options that would allow blf to be > contained/fractured to a specific local server. For example, say customer > x has two locations connected via a 5 mb link, each location has a node of > an HA configuration. Make the assumption that users at location A only > need to see 'status' of other users at location 'A' the same holds true for > location 'B'. Would it make sense to have a phone then tied to a location > (server) - which puts them in that localized 'BLF' group? > > This would allow for a unified system to support multiple locations with a > mediocre connection between servers. The alternative is to run multiple, > separate sipXecs systems - which works fine, but is less than ideal. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Joegen Baclor > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:23 AM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Bug fix release update: sipXecs 4.4.0 update #17 > > On 07/11/2012 06:06 PM, Claas Hilbrecht wrote: > > Hello Joegen, > > > > thanks for the quick replay. > > > >> Unfortunately not. The outbound processor only allows you to modify > >> SIP headers but not retarget nor to drop certain messages. > > What a pitty. I thought this could be a solution to solve the > > bandwidth problem. Is dropping of certain messages a further > > enhancement or is this impossible at all? > > > No this is not possible. Dropping messages on the proxy will not stop the > UA sending the request (in you case RLS) to retransmit it when it did not > get any response and would eventually result to a time out. > Giving the ability to mess around with transactions on this level is > calling for trouble. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the > individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or > entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the original, > and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be > secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, > destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County > Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or > omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email > transmission. > > > Garrett County Government, > 203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 > www.garrettcounty.org > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
