Gotcha - thanks. I did notice a whole lot of extraneous consumer-like config junk in the Vitelity template.
On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:06 , Tony Graziano wrote: > I refer to the bandwidth.com template because it has all the correct settings > in there for non-registration (ip based only) and works fine in such cases. > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Kurt Albershardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2012, at 12:01 , Tony Graziano wrote: > > > I think if you listen to meL > > Assume you meant 'me' there, and I am! > > > > use sipxbridge to anchor the calls (otherwise you will not be able to > > transfer it) > > Aha, that makes sense. > > > I was just curious about what in the bandwidth.com template made it more > appropriate to use than the Vitelity template. > > Should I also choose the bandwidth.com template for outbound calls to > Vitelity with this non-registering config? > > > thanks! > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > sip: [email protected] > Fax: 434.465.6833 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Linked-In Profile: > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 > Ask about our Internet Fax services! > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! > > > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > sip: [email protected] > > Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net > Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
