The problem is specifically with Aastra phones that if port is set to 0
then it will use SRV, is port is set it will use A-Record resolution.  The
phone config template is putting in 5060 and this should be user definable
and should default to 0.

Mike

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Tony Graziano
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Mark Dutton <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I did say exactly what I did to make it work in an earlier
>> post. The problem was that the SipX provisioning software
>> was not carrying the port = 0 variable in the device group
>> server settings for registrar and proxy. Even though the
>> device group profile has 0, the device profile still puts in
>> 5060 as a default. You have to go to each device
>> individually and override the setting with 0. This then
>> causes the handset to use the default port of 5060, but not
>> to specify it in the URI. This then made the MWI server
>> happy to auth it.
>>
>
> In normal instances, sipxecs tries to be "SRV aware". Using port "0" means
> to look up the information (automatic) and DNS will find the correct port
> and transport.
>
> " You have to go to each device individually and override the setting with
> 0. " Is this the case on 4.4 or 4.6 or both?
>
> I would help if you supplied the value for whatever versions that you had
> to manually change in the handset:
>
> i.e. sip line1 proxy port: 0 to sip line1 proxy port: 5060
>
> to get it to work.
>
> Because on my systems (4.4 and 4.6), it says this in the line settings.
>
>
> (i.e Phone, Line, Server Settings)
>
> sip line1 registrar port: 5060
> sip line1 proxy port: 5060
>
> So I do not know what is different on yours. On mine my DNS records are
> fully populated, but both generated configs say "5060" by default,
> specifically, but I don't have an Aastra to test with. The only thing that
> has "0" in it is the outbound proxy port. I am trying to understand why
> yours defaults to "0" and mine does not. For what it is worth, the
> timezones are not fully populated to be of good enough production use for
> certain parts of the world either so it needs a maintainer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> And I can tell you with all certainty that Zultys does not
>> use a special firmware. I have been a Zultys beta tester for
>> 5 years working with the dev guys. Aastra has a provisioning
>> system where it goes to the Internet on first boot (after
>> factory default) and looks up the mac address a database
>> maintained by Aastra. Aastra then sends back certain
>> identity information, such as the correct splash screen
>> bitmap and agent string, etc.
>>
>> The actual firmware is direct from Aastra and is unmodified
>> (in the Zultys case).
>>
>> What got my back up was that in my first post I asked what
>> information to gather to send to the SipX forum and instead
>> I was told to send a SIP log to Aastra. Believe me they
>> would have absolutely no interest in even replying.
>>
>
> I never suggested that. I did suggest a siptrace from sipx so the call
> flow could be seen using sipviewer.
>
>>
>> I am new to SipX, but not to IP tel. I am not sure which
>> logs give me what sort of information (apart from
>> sipXproxy.log). I have been using sipx-trace and sipviewer
>> (when necessary) to do my investigations to date. Where I
>> came unstuck with this was that I did not know why I was
>> getting an auth error.
>>
>> As it turned out, it was because the phone was subscribing
>> with the port in the URI. From Joegen's post (the RFC
>> excerpt), I could see that the port designator is a key part
>> of a URI match and this is what SipX didn't like. However,
>> if SipX was being strict, it should not have allowed the
>> REGISTER, or INVITE methods either as these too were
>> appending the port to the URI.
>>
>> One has to be pragmatic with SIP. There are so many
>> "viewpoints" on what is legal. When it comes to Aastra, a
>> large, isolationist company, or SipX, an open community, it
>> is going to be the latter that is more likely to accomodate
>> change than the former. Just the way of the world.
>> --
>> Regards
>>
>> Mark Dutton
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.465.6833
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Linked-In Profile:
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
> Ask about our Internet Fax services!
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab
> 2013!
> <http://sipxcolab2013.eventbrite.com/?discount=tony2013>
>
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> sip: [email protected].**net<[email protected]>
>
> Helpdesk Customers: 
> http://myhelp.myitdepartment.**net<http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net>
> Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>



-- 
Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services
eZuce, Inc.

300 Brickstone Square****

Suite 201****

Andover, MA. 01810
O.978-296-1005 X2015
M.207-956-0262
@mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=35504760&trk=tab_pro>
www.ezuce.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and
those who don't.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to