Yes a sipx thing. What I typically do it if I need to bring anything more than 1 time in the execution of the group I add additional lines just for the purpose.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! On Aug 17, 2012 4:09 PM, "Philippe Laurent" <p...@ideos.com> wrote: > Can't call an extension more than once? Is that a sipX thing? > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Tony Graziano < > tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > >> You cannot call the same extension more than once. That's what you are >> doing and that will not work. >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> Tony Graziano, Manager >> Telephone: 434.984.8430 >> sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net >> Fax: 434.465.6833 >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> Linked-In Profile: >> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 >> Ask about our Internet Fax services! >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab >> 2013! >> On Aug 17, 2012 3:09 PM, "Philippe Laurent" <p...@ideos.com> wrote: >> >>> This isn't complicated, and yet it doesn't work. Bashing welcome. >>> >>> The plan: >>> Incoming DID call -> >>> >>> 1) Ring ext 809 twice -> no answer, go to 2 -> >>> >>> 2) Ring, as a group, ext 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809 four times - no >>> answer, go to 3 -> >>> >>> 3) Ring all extensions (801-810) three times - no answer -> drop to >>> autoattendant for voicemail choices. >>> >>> The problem: >>> #1 works fine. When #2 above gets triggered, all phones except for 209 >>> ring. When #3 triggers, 804-809 do not ring, but 801/802/803/810 ring, and >>> do drop into autoattendant after the call time expires as required. So, >>> more succinctly, if a phone was involved in a the previous group, it will >>> not ring in the next group, for a reason unknown to me. >>> >>> I've used a number of different methods to try and get this to work. >>> Using Phantom users for each group, performing forwards, or using Phantom >>> user to #1 and Hunt groups for the rest of it. >>> >>> Any clues as to what I'm not doing right? >>> >>> Philippe >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >> >> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: >> Telephone: 434.984.8426 >> sip: helpdesk@voice.myitdepartment.**net<helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net> >> >> Helpdesk Customers: >> http://myhelp.myitdepartment.**net<http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net> >> Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: helpd...@voice.myitdepartment.net Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
