This makes a lot of sense to me.

On Aug 18, 2012, at 5:03 , Michael Picher wrote:

> The other option here, which is where I had hoped were were heading with 4.6, 
> is to have a userID and an Extension field (not extension as an alias).  This 
> way, a userID is really a userID and an extension is really an extension 
> (that gets displayed / programmed into a phone).
> 
> Thanks,
>   Mike
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to