This made my day, A.) FS 1.2.1 works B.) FS from their repo just works Thanks Niek. I guess the answer is that is unofficially works, and use this method until 4.6.1 comes out.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Niek Vlessert <[email protected]> wrote: > Excuse me, what we did was this, even easier: > - Add Official Freeswitch repo > - yum update > - This removes the freeswitch rpm package provided with sipxecs (not the > freeswitch sipxecs package if you know what I mean) > - Done :) > > Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:40 heeft Niek Vlessert het volgende geschreven: > >> We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing >> 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues. >> >> Thanks for the info. >> >> Regards >> >> Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:09 heeft Douglas Hubler het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Niek Vlessert <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch >>>> 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too >>>> new? >>> >>> No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other >>> things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you >>> want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official >>> RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works. >>> There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
