So, we've discovered the problem(and a partial solution). It works as it should only if we're both using udp.
200(Server2, TCP) -> 201(Server1, TCP) doesn't work 201(Server1, TCP) -> 200(Server2, TCP) doesn't work 200(Server2, UDP) -> 201(Server1, TCP) works 201(Server1, TCP) -> 200(Server2, UDP) doesn't work 200(Server2, TCP) -> 201(Server1, UDP) doesn't work 201(Server1, UDP) -> 200(Server2, TCP) works 200(Server2, UDP) -> 201(Server1, UDP) works 201(Server1, UDP) -> 200(Server2, UDP) works TLS not tested now, but had the same results as tcp Logs: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1athqwizv0tv75q/SipX.rar -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Niculae Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:06 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:20 PM, darthzejdr <[email protected]> wrote: > Unfortunately i don't understand those logs. Is there something wrong > with my configuration? Or any ideas what to try next? I am doing yum > update now so will do another try then and see if anything changed. > There is a problem with snapshot right now we're working on, could you please attach the entire sipXproxy.log file and sipregistrar.log form both nodes when this is reproduced George _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
