And for new installs on 4.6, should we yum update daily as new packages are being compiled on a daily basis?
- MM On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Douglas Hubler <[email protected]> wrote: > short answer... > not officially released > > long answer... > 4.6 is not officially released even though i believe it to be more > stable than 4.4. Users that have run into issues with 4.6 may > disagree, because some are finding some issues due to the sheer amount > of changes that went into 4.6 Unfortunately we're finding issues > very slowly hence the delay. > > ezuce has been using 4.6 build for quite some time so if you're doing > new installs, without question go with 4.6. > > The other day the 4.6 release was horribly broken but it was found and > fix immediately. We have automated tests, but it still requires a > little manual intervention to start and run > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Claas Hilbrecht > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Jesse, > > > >> I tried searching before asking, however, I could find the answer. Is > > [...] > >> library still shows that 4.4 is stable and 4.6 is beta. Is that > accurate? > > > > I've asked a similar question at 07. Nov. 2012 with the title: "wiki (and > > other sites) outdated?" on this list. The answer was something like: "the > > wiki and download pages are community driven, so that's why there are not > > up to date". > > > > As far as I understand sipXecs 4.6 is released. Just the information is > not > > up to date. > > > > -- > > Claas Hilbrecht > > http://www.jucs-kramkiste.de > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
