thanks :)

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> wrote:
> https://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs/commit/9b2ea254b15a6ade18a80a6790c6ba9ee6af6bb7
> https://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs/commit/f8c70a8158cf24dbe10b04dd5ecb3dc7bde9bbd3
>
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
>
>
> On 11/26/2012 07:19 PM, Domenico Chierico wrote:
>
> yes it is mainly the same
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Domenico,
>
> I committed to 4.6.  Would you mind sending a patch for release-4.4 as well?
>
>
> On 11/26/2012 05:25 PM, Domenico Chierico wrote:
>
> well I've rewritten the patch against 4.6 this one should apply clearly
>
> thanks
> Domenico Chierico
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Domenico,
>
> I've reviewed your patch and I am accepting it for commit.  However:
>
> [joegen@sipdevel sipxecs-master]$ git apply --check
> ~/Desktop/fix_sipxclient.patch
> error: patch failed: sipXtackLib/src/net/SipClient.cpp:834
> error: sipXtackLib/src/net/SipClient.cpp: patch does not apply
>
>
> Can you create a new one against branch release-4.6 ?
>
> Joegen
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/13/2012 10:53 PM, Domenico Chierico wrote:
>
> Just to simplify tests here is the patch
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Domenico Chierico
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi
> We have 1 sipxecs 4.4 with 50 users installed on kvm based virtual
> machine.
> We had the proxy that ran over 290% of cpu with an average cpu load
> close to 95%. Applying the review #22, the stuff start goes better and
> we are now close to 40% of cpu load.
>
> Some of this load come from the known SUBSCRIBE issue, but some others
> come from a strange behaviour of the tcp part of the sip stack that we
> found:
>
> - linphone client increases the load on sipXproxy, with his own
> strange keepalive method ("Jak" msg to the proxy) and switching the
> transport from tcp to udp.
>
> - Some other evidences come from my personal tests as I notify on 3 of
> August on dev-ml.
>
> Now I'm testing a solution that seems to work, but I wish to know your
> opinion. I've change the order of "if" statements into SipClient::run
> and I moved the branch about POLLERR and POLLHUP as first.
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Domenico Chierico
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm just playing around with go(lang), and this days I was starting
> with sip stack implementation, just when messages starts float around
> I'd realize that I've written a DOS for proxy ..
> I just send INVITE to the proxy than reads for 100 and 180 and so I
> close the socket, at this point I got this into the logs forever:
>
>
> "2012-08-03T09:31:03.817653Z":43810:SIP:DEBUG:testpbx.labsip2ser.net:SipClientTcp-30:22CEF700:SipXProxy:"SipClient[SipClientTcp-30]::run
> resPoll= 1 revents: fd[0]= 0 fd[1]= 1d"
>
> "2012-08-03T09:31:03.817668Z":43811:KERNEL:DEBUG:testpbx.labsip2ser.net:SipClientTcp-30:22CEF700:SipXProxy:"OsSocket::isReadyToWrite
> poll returned 1 in socket: 21 0x7f5eec002070"
>
> "2012-08-03T09:31:03.817683Z":43812:SIP:DEBUG:testpbx.labsip2ser.net:SipClientTcp-30:22CEF700:SipXProxy:"SipClient[SipClientTcp-30]::run
> resPoll= 1 revents: fd[0]= 0 fd[1]= 1d"
>
> "2012-08-03T09:31:03.817698Z":43813:KERNEL:DEBUG:testpbx.labsip2ser.net:SipClientTcp-30:22CEF700:SipXProxy:"OsSocket::isReadyToWrite
> poll returned 1 in socket: 21 0x7f5eec002070"
>
> "2012-08-03T09:31:03.817714Z":43814:SIP:DEBUG:testpbx.labsip2ser.net:SipClientTcp-30:22CEF700:SipXProxy:"SipClient[SipClientTcp-30]::run
> resPoll= 1 revents: fd[0]= 0 fd[1]= 1d"
>
> "2012-08-03T09:31:03.817728Z":43815:KERNEL:DEBUG:testpbx.labsip2ser.net:SipClientTcp-30:22CEF700:SipXProxy:"OsSocket::isReadyToWrite
> poll returned 1 in socket: 21 0x7f5eec002070"
>
> I hope this helps..
>
> bye
> Domenico Chierico
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to