The provider I have tied into my 4.6 system is specifically because they refuse 
to redirect inbound to anything but 5060.  So I would have to URI dial and rely 
on SRV to test, and then still tcpdump to verify it was happening as your 
configuration is currently.  In Mikes follow up email he clarified Proxy was 
working externally on 5060, maybe just give it a test and see if there is any 
difference.

At this point I have to admit I think I am confusing the actual problem with 
the Subject of the original thread.  Is the problem extension not available, or 
did I just zone out this has been a MoH issue the whole time since its the Bria 
components?  

In any case if proxy is on 5060, I would potentially test inbound signaling to 
5060 from your provider.  If I get time to upgrade my 4.4 server this weekend 
now that we finished our basic testing for contact center I should be able to 
use Bandwidth.com and simulate your environment on port 5080 and compare to 
normal 5060 through my alternate provider.

Were you using strictly desktop Bria versions, or were any iPhone/iPad/Android 
versions being tested as well?

Thanks,
Trevor Benson, Network Engineer
A1 Networks
Voice: 707-703-1041

For support issues please email [email protected] or call 707-703-1050





On Nov 30, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Nicholas Drayer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, just to confirm, it's 100% 5080 that I'm using. I use IP authentication 
> for the SIP trunk, with incoming calls going to [email protected]:5080.
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] on behalf of Michael Picher 
> [[email protected]]
> Sent: November 30, 2012 2:49 PM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipx 4.6 inbound ivr-->extension always not 
> available
> 
> you'll find you have transfer issues and whatnot with port 5060...  it is not 
> the right port.  5080 is where sipXbridge is listening on.  this is not a 
> typo.  the proxy listens on port 5080.
> 
> mike
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Trevor L Benson <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Nicholas,
> 
>   This has been on my mind a little over the past few days, was this just a 
> typo from the 4.4 configuration for ITSP's using 5080 inbound, or is the ITSP 
> still sending to you on 5080?  We tested out inbound on 5060 (albeit weeks 
> ago and many updates) and it was working fine.  I am guessing its a typo, or 
> you configured your system properly to still use 5080, but it's sticking in 
> my craw that maybe this isn't a typo or the ITSP is sending to the wrong 
> port?  
> 
>   I have not tested the 5080 inbound on openUC 4.6 instead of 5060.  Checking 
> Devices -> SIP Trunk SBCs shows that sipXbridge-1 has port 5080 listed.  
> Features -> NAT Traversal under Server Config shows the private IP,  public 
> IP, and 5060 for SIP port and 5061 for TLS SIP port.  It could very well work 
> that 5080 inbound from ITSP's still functions as it did in 4.4 and I think I 
> remember someone saying you could use either or both?  However I haven't 
> bothered to test it yet since I was ecstatic to get native 5060 for some 
> picky providers and since that appeared to be working over a month ago in our 
> tests I just wanted to ask if the calls were really sent to 5080 or 5060?
> 
> Trevor
> 
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Nicholas Drayer <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> It’s only when a call comes in via the sipXecs server’s 5080 port that the 
>> Bria client exhibits no audio sent/received.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services
> eZuce, Inc.
> 300 Brickstone Square
> Suite 201
> Andover, MA. 01810
> O.978-296-1005 X2015 
> M.207-956-0262
> @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> 
> linkedin
> www.ezuce.com
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - Alan Kay
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to