>From my recollection, SAS does not support using a SRV record. This is a bit of a problem as I see it. Trading one point of failure for another. I guess you just need to ask yourself, is it more likely that an ITSP will go down or your gateway will fail. I think the former is more likely.
Mike On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Marco Colaneri <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thank you Josh, > > I know that way to configure SAS. > > We didn't choose it because all sip signaling traffic goes > through the gateway. > So if the gateway fails or becomes unreachable, all the > phone can't register and reach SipXecs servers. > > Maybe we could get over this problem by defining a new SRV > record on DNS (e.g. gwsite1.sipdomain) which points > primarily to the audiocodes gateway and secondarily to the > sipxecs servers. This configuration should fix problems due > to Audiocodes failures. Am I right or I'm missing something? > If we didn't deploy a DNS server locally, would this > solution still work when the site WAN link fails? How could > phones resolve outbound proxy address? Perhaps using DNS > records caching? > > Thank you very much for help. > > Marco > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services eZuce, Inc. 300 Brickstone Square**** Suite 201**** Andover, MA. 01810 O.978-296-1005 X2015 M.207-956-0262 @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=35504760&trk=tab_pro> www.ezuce.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - Alan Kay
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
