Hi Alexander... thanks for the response. I understand, and I hope that this is correct, that GIPS has a G.729 codec implementation. If so, what would it take to leverage this codec instead of going through VoiceAge or Intel? Can the indemnification be done by sipro in this case?
Regards, Paul -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Chemeris Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 11:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipxtapi-dev] MpMisc.UcbPool Hello, On 8/21/06, Paul Yago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also need to understand the best way to place a new codec (g.729) into the existing > architecture. If this isn't already checked in to the sipXmedia-update-branch I'd be glad > to offer it back. This codec is widely used, but have very restrictive license. So we should have simple way to enable and disable its support. Moreover there are at least two well known commercial G.729 implementation - Intel and VoiceAge (it has 'free' version under Windows!). So I think we should provide the way to use one or other. Since there was no patches, conforming to this criteria, G.729 is not checked in to the svn. If you'll write such code even for one library, it will have good chances to be checked in. :) You may look into this patch for an example of codec integration: http://scm.sipfoundry.org/viewsvn/sipX?view=rev&rev=7293 When writing new code, don't forget about this guidelines, please: http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipX/doc/coding-standard.html Regards, Alexander Chemeris. _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/ _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
