Thanks a lot, that definitely clears things up. Arjun
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Chemeris Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 5:12 PM To: Nair, Arjun (CAR:9D30) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipxtapi-dev] Scm versus sipxecs repository Hi, On 4/3/08, Arjun Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the difference between the - sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/rep/ - and > - scm.sipfoundry.org/rep/ -? I noticed that the repository at sipxecs > does not have a sipXtapi branch and the sipXcallLib/sipXtackLib are > different from the repository at scm.sipfoundry. Is one newer than the other? sipxecs.sipfoundry.org repository contains code for sipXecs project - SIP server with dual license (Pingtel-proprietary and LGPL). Pingtel does not maintain sipXtapi project, because it is UA-side, not server-side. scm.sipfoundry.org repository is clean LPGL code, it contains old code of Pingtel SIP-server (supressed by sipXecs now) and up-to-date code for sipXtapi. We're aiming to keep sipXtapi as real open-source solution without double licensing, so we're working with old 'scm' repository. Hope this clarify things a bit. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. SIPez LLC. SIP VoIP, IM and Presence Consulting http://www.SIPez.com tel: +1 (617) 273-4000 _______________________________________________ sipxtapi-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipxtapi-dev/
