Mattmann,

I think a bare bones demo would be extremely valuable. I can get the how-to 
docs up to snuff once there is a good baseline core in trunk. What this project 
really needs are some definite goals and milestones that we can go by. What you 
suggested below is great but it needs to be laid out in the official wiki, 
right? I assume the index of choice is going to be based on Lucene. There are 
options to this and @tlpinney has laid out the foundation for a really fast, 
low-level index that can trump the inverted index. ElasticSearch also has some 
promising spatial capabilities. See below. 

 https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/issues/1486

Adam


On Jan 8, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:

> Guys,
> 
> The Incubator is talking about retiring projects. It has been suggested that
> SIS is on that list. That concerns me. 
> 
> I'm going to do my best to step it up in Q1. We'll see if I (and hopefully 
> many
> others) can get this podling back on track. I care deeply about the issues 
> here.
> 
> Here's my concrete set of things to work on over the next 3 months:
> 
> 1. List of issues I'm going to try to roll for in 0.2: http://s.apache.org/sn
> 2. Get a baked in demo with Apache OODT that:
>  - dumps HDF/NetCDF data out of CAS Product Server GeoRSS into SIS
>  - loads it into SIS QTree index
>  - makes it searchable via bounding box and point/radius
>  - write wiki page (on our new SIS wiki that I'm going to remind people exists
> in my next email)
> 
> Patches, help, discussion welcome. 
> 
> Speaking of which if there are things people are interested in, please have 
> discussions
> here on list and let's show others that there are more than just a few people 
> that care
> about a Geospatial Apache licensed toolkit here at the ASF.
> 
> Cheers,
> Chris
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <[email protected]>
>> Date: January 8, 2012 9:05:33 AM PST
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Actively retiring projects (was: Incubator Board Report 
>> November 2011)
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> 
>> Hey Jukka,
>> 
>> On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> 
>>>> 2010-02-21 SIS
>>> 
>>> S: Last activity in November
>>> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sis-dev/201111.mbox/browser)
>>> R: Retire unless activity picks up in Q1.
>> 
>> As a SIS mentor I'd say this is fair, but my personal gut tells me it would 
>> be nice to give
>> SIS until end of Q2/Q3. Also I'll echo my call again for contributors 
>> (mentors, geospatial
>> enthusiasts, others) and for folks that are interested in having an ALv2 
>> licensed 
>> geospatial toolkit to come on over to sis-dev@ or sis-user@ and contribute.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>> 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: [email protected]
>> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: [email protected]
> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 

Reply via email to