http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html From there it looks like LGPL is a definite no no...Does this mean that it can't be included as an option when being built?
Adam On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Joe White <whitejf30...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this would be a great addition to SIS. I did a cursory search on > JTS and Maven and didn't turn up anything other than a feature request from > 2008 asking for JTS to be added to iBiblio as a Maven repo. There may be > some additional ugliness getting it and Maven working together, but it > shouldn't be too bad, and there is already a request out there for it. > > Joe > > On Mar 5, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Adam Estrada wrote: > > > Hi Ryan! I for one would love to see this integrated in to SIS. The fact > > that JTS is "optional" is a huge benefit for those who > > could potentially need its capabilities. And yes...in time, there will be > > an Apache version that resides in trunk but for now I like that there is > > optional support for it. How do you propose that it gets built? Can JTS > > install/build through Maven? I honestly have not looked through the JTS > > sources. > > > > Adam > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello- > >> > >> We have been working for a while to build better spatial support into > >> Lucene. While integrating with lucene, we separated out the core > >> spatial code from the lucene specific stuff. Since the code has > >> compile/test dependencies on JTS, we hosted it at github. See: > >> https://spatial4j.com/ > >> > >> The code itself is ASL, but we want to enable complex polygon support > >> for people who choose to include the LGPL library JTS. In time, there > >> may be pure ASL polygon solutions. > >> > >> From previous discussions, my believe this is a non-starter for SIS. > >> Is this accurate? Or should we investigate how this code can work > >> together? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Ryan > >> > >
