Apologies, I just re-read Chris' original reply and realised that Chris already addressed many of the questions I just asked!
Sounds like a good idea to have different normalization methods that can be associated with different CRSs. Proj4J has some useful stuff, but we could certainly develop our own CRS conversions in SIS instead. As you guys have discussed previously these could become a major component/benefit of SIS. Either way we definitely need the capability to convert coordinates. On 5 July 2012 14:45, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should accept any values, and give the user the option to > decide if they want to normalize them. But maybe we should associate > the normalization methods with particular coordinate reference systems, > and furthermore, maybe we should just make CRSs official first class > citizens in future versions of SIS. Thoughts? > > Looking at Proj4J will probably help spark some ideas so I'd be curious > to know your opinions of that.
