>From sdague  Thu Apr 25 15:33:00 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852FCCE82
        for <sdague@localhost>; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.dague.net [64.26.55.212]
        by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0)
        for sdague@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net 
[216.136.171.252])
        by garcia.siteprotect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01682
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:31:11 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
        by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
        id 170oxO-0006ap-00; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:31:06 -0700
Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101])
        by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp 
        (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
        id 170onf-0004yj-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:21:04 -0700
Received: from northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (northrelay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.151])
        by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3PJKbms458740
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:20:40 -0400
Received: from smtp.linux.ibm.com (ltc-eth1000.torolab.ibm.com [9.26.4.197])
        by northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO/VER6.1) with ESMTP id g3PJKZh89872
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:20:35 -0400
Received: from gromit.val.pok.ibm.com (heimdall.pok.ibm.com [9.117.148.143])
        by smtp.linux.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082703FE07
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Chase-Salerno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Sisuite-devel] Re: SISuite GUI framework
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <sisuite-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=sisuite-devel>
X-Original-Date: 25 Apr 2002 15:20:35 -0400
Date: 25 Apr 2002 15:20:35 -0400
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1170
Lines: 30

Hi Doug,

Glad to hear about the work you're planning on doing and I think its a
good plan, however, I'd like to discuss a few things about it.

First off, have you looked at tksis? This ships with the SystemInstaller
code and provides some of what you are doing. I'd look at the CVS
version if you can since there's been a fair amount of development on it
in the past week or 2.

What we really need to do in SIS is converge the interfaces between
SystemImager and SystemInstaller (and other stuff). It really doesn't
make much sense to have both addclients and mksirange since they
externally do the same things. It also confusing to the users.

It might make more sense to provide the SIS commands in this GUI rather
than the SystemImager commands, where applicable of course. Since the
SIS commands end up calling the SystemImager commands or APIs
eventually, you'll end up with the same function and not have to provide
2 panels.

I look forward to much discussion of this on this list.

Mike


_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel

Reply via email to