On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:15:25PM -0500, Brian Elliott Finley wrote: > Thus spake Dann Frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >The code might be ready, but I haven't tested any builds. > >(I expected to have time to work on it at OLS, but as usual, > >found other beverage related things to do). > > > >I also haven't moved other arches forward to 2.6; so, depending > >on whether we still want to do that or not. I'm not picky; if > >we want SATA support, then I'd suggest a 2.6, and I can put it together > >before next week.
Well.. moving x86 to a 2.6 kernel has turned out to be non-trivial - we need a new uclibc to build against 2.6 kernel headers, and we need a new busybox to build against the new uclibc - both of which have moved to a nicer kernel-like config system, which should simplify maintenance one we get over this hump. I've upgraded both packages in my tree, and everything builds, but I'm still debugging a dynamic linking problem with the initrd, and am giving up for the night. If someone is interested in taking a look at this problem, let me know and I can post a patch. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
