That is an eventual possibility. Dann still believes we should ship
some sort of standard kernel, though, and he's usually right about such
things. So for now I'm thinking that when UYOK is stable, we ship a
vanilla kernel for each supported arch, and use the exact same source
for all of them.
BTW, when we do a release, I'm thinking that it would be good to ship
kernels, et. al., in support of x86, x86_64, ia64. Any thoughts on
ppc64?
Thus spake efocht ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thursday 15 December 2005 07:17, Brian Elliott Finley wrote:
>> Historically, I'd tried to keep all archs on the same kernel so only one
>> tarball is necessary.
I'd like to do that, but we've never been able to do that so far.
Perhaps with 3.6, udev, and uyok, we can go with a more generic kernel
config for the standard kernel, and leave uyok to support the oddities.
And maybe even achieve a common kernel source.
Well, in fact with a stable uyok we might be able to get rid completely of the
need for shipping a kernel. That would certainly simplify things ... (do I
need to run & hide? ;-)
Regards,
Erich
--
Brian Elliott Finley
Mobile: 630.631.6621
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
Sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
