Title: Re: [Systemimager-commits] r3331 - branches/3.6.x
Hey Brian:
 
In that case should get rid of the "%define ver" line altogether?
 
Cheers,
 
Bernard


From: Brian Elliott Finley on behalf of Brian Elliott Finley
Sent: Sat 17/12/2005 20:05
To: Bernard Li
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Systemimager-commits] r3331 - branches/3.6.x

Bernard,

Doesn't hurt to do this, but as it turns out, the "make source_tarball"
rule does it for you.  Take a look at the spec file in the source
tarball I've already uploaded. ;-)

Cheers, -Brian



Thus spake Bernard Li ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>Author: bli
>Date: 2005-12-17 17:39:51 -0600 (Sat, 17 Dec 2005)
>New Revision: 3331
>
>Modified:
>   branches/3.6.x/systemimager.spec
>Log:
>:)
>
>
>Modified: branches/3.6.x/systemimager.spec
>===================================================================
>--- branches/3.6.x/systemimager.spec   2005-12-17 23:30:07 UTC (rev 3330)
>+++ branches/3.6.x/systemimager.spec   2005-12-17 23:39:51 UTC (rev 3331)
>@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> %define name     systemimager
>-%define ver      3.6.1
>+%define ver      3.6.2
> %define rel      1
> %define prefix   /usr
> %define _build_all 1
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>systemimager-commits mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/systemimager-commits

--
Brian Elliott Finley
Mobile:  630.631.6621

Reply via email to