Title: Re: si_monitor & flamethrower
Okay I'll let you fix that, since you probably know where all those binaries are called throughout SystemImager.
 
BTW, in the top level Makefile, when you run setup.py for BitTorrent, shouldn't it be passed ${USR} instead of ${PREFIX}?  When I build the RPM the files get installed to /usr instead of the <buildroot>/usr.
 
Cheers,
 
Bernard


From: Andrea Righi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 16/04/2006 15:13
To: Bernard Li
Cc: sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: si_monitor & flamethrower

Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi Andrea:
>
> So would BitTorrent transport require that rsyncd be on as well?

No, BT uses torrentinfo-console to evaluate the size of the image... but
netbootmond always requires rsyncd...

>
> Regarding the server side BT - wouldn't that conflict if the user
> decides to install a separate BitTorrent RPM which provides those
> binaries?  Perhaps we should prefix the filenames with "si_"?
>

Yes. I think it's better to prepend "si_" to the BT binaries used by
systemimager.

-Andrea

Reply via email to