wow! are you monitoring 50 clients? :-) have you tested the bittorrent transport?
Anyway the use of a temporary file seems reasonable, but have you tested it or it's an hypothesis? do you have already a patch? Thanks, -Andrea Matt Jamison wrote: > I'd like to suggest the following change in si_monitor, after some heavy duty > pounding... > > Rather than opening (truncating) the xml databasefile directly on each > update, how about writing to a tmp file and then renaming the tmp file over > the top of the actual database? With just 50 simultaneous clients, the > truncation is quite noticeable. PERL's rename should be used to make the > update atomic... > > Thanks, > > Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list Sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel