> I guess I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't missing something, > and it sounds as if I'm not -- it's not designed to work out of the > box in this type of environment.
Just a quick note, at my workplace we have had some conflict integrating system imager into our environment as (clearly indicated in the doc) system imager was designed as a cluster image server (i.e. 1 sis server for every rack or group of racks). This is not system imagers fault, it is just something that my company is not that familiar with. They see the system imager server as a central point of contact for all of our linux systems (500+), similar to a dns or mail server. Not sure exactly what my point is, just wanted to point this out :) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Sisuite-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
