Mark Seger wrote:
I've been wondering what people's general impressions are with flamethrower these days. I do remember about a year ago it sort of worked but was a little flakey. I also know things have gotten better. What I don't know if whether or not it's felt to be 'production worthy' yet. Are there any testimonials from satisfied users?We at SARA use is nowdays for our production cluster. We encountered a lot problems with installing and the configuration of the stuff. There where several bug in the software (eg udpcast). The bugs have now been fixed in the new versions. I do not know if systemimager and flamethrower use this new versions yet?
Conclusion for us is that we did a lot of tweaking to make it work and use our versions of software (udpcast and busybox). Fixed some bugs in the /etc/init.d/functions of the ramdisk image. It was worth the work now we can install one or a lot of machines in the same time.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ Sisuite-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
