When I started up the systeminstaller-x11 client tksis from the old version the other day, it did not indicate that it had found any pre-existing images on my image server which is incorrect. Are you certain that the old version of systeminstaller knows anything about the command renaming from lsimage, getimage, and etc to si_lsimage, si_getimage, and etc?
In addition it put out the following errors on startup: tksis default_override_dir: no such variable at /etc/systemimager/systemimager.conf line 19 autoinstall_tarball_dir: no such variable at /etc/systemimager/systemimager.conf line 67 autoinstall_torrent_dir: no such variable at /etc/systemimager/systemimager.conf line 73 default_override_dir: no such variable at /etc/systemimager/systemimager.conf line 19 autoinstall_tarball_dir: no such variable at /etc/systemimager/systemimager.conf line 67 autoinstall_torrent_dir: no such variable at /etc/systemimager/systemimager.conf line 73 so to me it looks like there might be some compatibility issues. -----Original Message----- >From: Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Apr 20, 2006 1:24 PM >To: [email protected], [email protected] >Subject: [Oscar-devel] RE: [Sisuite-users] UYOK in 3.6.3 does not have /dev >entries for second scsi disk > >Hi Steve: > >> If I understand things correctly systeminstaller is what is >> used to build an >> image from scratch (i.e. from RPMs) rather than pulling an >> image from a >> golden-client. Is that correct? There is a seperate project >> web pages for >> systeminstaller linked off of the systemimager.org web pages >> but all of >> the stuff there seems to be pretty old and moldy. >> Is the update of that outside of oscar a dead project so to >> speak? The last >> files released on the systeminstaller sourceforge project >> pages are from >> Oct. of 2003. > >Yes, systeminstaller is used to build image without a golden client. > >The last version that was not merged with OSCAR should still work, so >you can use that if you really need it. > >We pretty much decided that we are the only people who use >systeminstaller and decided to make the code more specific to our needs, >which means there will be bits that are specific to OSCAR (thus the name >systeminstaller-oscar). > >If there is overwelming request for systeminstaller to be continued as a >separate package, we can definitely discuss that, but like I said, the >old version should still continue to work fine. > >Cheers, > >Bernard ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sisuite-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users
