On Aug 5, 2014, at 5:57 AM, Ian Horrocks <[email protected]> wrote:
> Email sent to [email protected] currently elicits and automatic > reply stating that "You should receive a response from the Working Group with > a few weeks". This is not appropriate given that the working group closed > several years ago. Is there any way to change the message in the automatic > reply? Hi Ian, We'll definitely update this. Thank you, Ian > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: W3C Postmaster <[email protected]> >> Subject: Auto: [email protected] autoreply >> Date: 5 August 2014 11:48:55 BST >> To: [email protected] >> >> Thank you for your comments on OWL. You should receive a response from the >> Working Group with a few weeks. >> >> ----- original message: ---------------------------------------------- >>> From [email protected] Tue Aug 05 10:48:55 2014 >> Received: from relay16.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.166]) >> by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) >> (envelope-from <[email protected]>) >> id 1XEcIX-00080T-UT >> for [email protected]; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:48:55 +0000 >> Received: from smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.207]) >> by relay16.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80) >> (envelope-from <[email protected]>) >> id 1XEcI5-0004JO-r7; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:48:25 +0100 >> Received: from dhcp3-nat.cs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.88.5] helo=[192.168.18.104]) >> by smtp1.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) >> (Exim 4.69) >> (envelope-from <[email protected]>) >> id 1XEcI5-0005s1-3g; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:48:25 +0100 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) >> Subject: Re: issue in OWL SS&FS and bug in mapping from RDF graphs >> From: Ian Horrocks <[email protected]> >> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 11:47:23 +0100 >> Cc: [email protected], >> Boris Motik <[email protected]> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Message-Id: <[email protected]> >> References: <[email protected]> >> To: Peter Patel-Schneider <[email protected]>, >> Michael Wessel <[email protected]> >> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) >> X-Oxford-Username: coml0201 >> Received-SPF: none client-ip=163.1.2.166; >> [email protected]; helo=relay16.mail.ox.ac.uk >> X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 >> X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.300, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3 >> X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XEcIX-00080T-UT 9e687837c2c7a2fc39f198b506c89403 >> >> Dear Peter and Michael, >> >> Thanks for highlighting these issues. I finally got around to adding it = >> to the list of errata (https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL_Errata).=20 >> >> Regards, >> Ian >> >> >> >> On 11 Apr 2014, at 22:09, "Patel-Schneider, Peter" = >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The OWL Structural Specification and Function-Style Syntax states for = >> most syntactic constructs with an arbitrary number of arguments that = >> these arguments are considered to be a set under structural similarity. >>> =20 >>> This causes no problems for many of these syntactic constructs but = >> there are a few where removing duplicates changes the meaning of the = >> construct. >>> =20 >>> For example, according to the wording in section 9.1.3 of SS&FS >>> =20 >>> DisjointClasses( ex:foo ex:foo ex:bar ) >>> =20 >>> implies that ex:foo is empty, which is very different from=20 >>> =20 >>> DisjointClasses( ex:foo ex:bar ) >>> =20 >>> It would not be easy to simply change these constructs to take = >> multisets because the OWL API would have to be changed. >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> I propose the following fix: >>> =20 >>> 1/ The functional-style syntax requires that the arguments to = >> DisjointClasses, DisjointObjectProperties, DisjointDataProperties, and = >> DifferentIndividuals and all but the first argument to DisjointUnion all = >> be structurally different. >>> =20 >>> 2/ When converting the triple x owl:disjointWith y where x and y are = >> structurally similar the axiom SubClassOf( CE(x) owl:Nothing ) is = >> produced. >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> This is not an ideal fix by any means, but a better fix would require = >> much more significant changes in deployed software. >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >>> =20 >>> =20 >> >> > > > -- Ian Jacobs <[email protected]> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
