Hi, Joe–
This isn't the right way to go about soliciting for a W3C standard.
Mass-spamming the W3C staff, in addition to being rude, makes it hard to
take any suggestion seriously.
If you have a good idea for a missing feature from the Web Platform,
propose a W3C Community Group [1]. Promote it on social media, talk to
other developers, and get them to support the formation of the community
group, and to get like-minded people to join the CG.
Once you've formed the CG, develop your idea with the people who join:
* draw up use cases and requirements
* explain why current features of the platform don't meet these requirements
* sketch out what the API or feature would look like, and how it would
behave
* draft this into a specification
* talk to W3C staff and W3C members in relevant mailing lists (perhaps
the WebApps WG), and ask them to take a look at your proposal
* if implementers like it, they may bring it into W3C as a
Recommendation-track standard.
[1] http://www.w3.org/community/
Regards-
-Doug
On 11/23/14 9:37 PM, /#!/JoePea wrote:
Hi Everyone,
There's something important missing in web development: window.screen does
not contain the screen's hardware pixel density.
True device-independent development is impossible without this value
exposed to web developers. It's easy to get these values from a screen's
EDID information and expose it. It'd be great if this was part of w3c spec
for browsers.
We (developers, programmers) want to make truly device-independent web
"apps", not web "pages".
"Native" developers can get EDID information directly from a screen, or
through native APIs, so why can't web programmers be afforded such a simple
number?
Please. I beg of you all. Make this part of the specs for browsers to
follow. Pleeeease, bring browser development to the next level by allowing
programmers to have full control of their hardware pixels.
*/#!/*JoePea