husted 02/01/30 17:48:19 Modified: xdocs index.xml Log: Add headlines section. Revision Changes Path 1.22 +6 -22 jakarta-site2/xdocs/index.xml Index: index.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/index.xml,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- index.xml 30 Jan 2002 21:53:03 -0000 1.21 +++ index.xml 31 Jan 2002 01:48:19 -0000 1.22 @@ -9,30 +9,14 @@ <body> -<section name="That flaming fireball in the sky..."> -<p> -In a recent <a -href="http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=SunInterview"; ->article</a>, Karen Tegan, Director of J2EE Compatibility and Platform -Services for Sun Microsystems, had the following to say: -</p> - -<p> -"The J2EE Compatible brand has achieved significant momentum over the -past two years, and we want to make sure that any open source efforts -don't impact the viability of that effort." -</p> +<section name="Headlines"> <p> -In other words, Sun doesn't give a hoot about whether J2EE licensing -restricts open source J2EE products (in case you missed it, it does). -Thus, the Apache Software Foundation's involvement in the Java Community -Process (JCP) is simply an advertising statement for Sun to claim that -they have a 'vision which uses open standards and non-proprietary -interfaces'. If you would like to express your opinions of Sun's -licensing terms, feel free to contact <a -href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a> and let us know what you -think. Thanks. +<ul> +<li><a href="site/news.html#0130.2">30 Jan 2002 - That flaming fireball in the sky...</a></li> +<li><a href="site/news.html#0130">30 Jan 2002 - Avalon Excalibur 4.1 Released</a></li> +<li><a href="site/news.html#0121">21 Jan 2001 - Tomcat 4.0.2 Beta 2 Released</a></li> +</ul> </p> </section>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
