jon         02/02/04 17:39:06

  Modified:    xdocs/site jspa-position.xml
  Log:
  added some links and clarified some definitions...
  
  -jon
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.3       +19 -16    jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/jspa-position.xml
  
  Index: jspa-position.xml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/jspa-position.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- jspa-position.xml 5 Feb 2002 01:30:37 -0000       1.2
  +++ jspa-position.xml 5 Feb 2002 01:39:06 -0000       1.3
  @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
   
   <body>
   
  -  <section name="Apache's JSPA Position">
  +<section name="Apache's JSPA Position">
   
   <p>
   The following is a statement of the Apache position with regard to the
  @@ -18,12 +18,14 @@
   
   <p>
   First, some background.  Over the past two years members of the JCP
  -Executive Committee, including Apache, have been working on revising
  -the legal agreement members sign with Sun when joining the JCP, known
  -as the "JSPA".  This document defines many of the rules of the JCP and
  -is responsible for allowing -- and in some cases requiring -- many of
  -the restrictions which have hindered open source implementations of
  -JSR specification.
  +Executive Committee, including Apache, have been working on revising the
  +legal agreement members sign with Sun when joining the JCP, known as the
  +"<a
  +href="http://www.jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/JSPA.pdf";>JSPA</a>"
  +(Java Specification Participation Agreement).  This document defines
  +many of the rules of the JCP and is responsible for allowing -- and in
  +some cases requiring -- many of the restrictions which have hindered
  +open source implementations of JSR specification.
   </p>
   
   <p>
  @@ -67,11 +69,11 @@
   </p>
   
   <p>
  -This first week of February the JSPA document is being released for
  -Community Review where JCP members will be allowed to view and comment
  -on the draft.  If you or your organization is a JCP member, you should
  -review the draft and form your own opinion on how these goals have
  -been satisfied.
  +This first week of February the latest version of the JSPA document is
  +being released for Community Review where JCP members will be allowed to
  +view and comment on the draft.  If you or your organization is a JCP
  +member, you should review the draft and form your own opinion on how
  +these goals have been satisfied.
   </p>
   
   <p>
  @@ -91,12 +93,13 @@
   
   <p>
   Consequently, Apache would not only like to see the above issues
  -resolved in the new JSPA, but furthermore will look for some assurance
  -from Sun that Sun's official legal opinion agrees that the above
  -requirements have been satisfied.
  +resolved in the new JSPA, but furthermore <a
  +href="/site/news.html#0130.2">will look for some assurance from Sun that
  +Sun's official legal opinion agrees that the above requirements have
  +been satisfied</a>.
   </p>
   
  -  </section>
  +</section>
   
   </body>
   </document>
  
  
  

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to