Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> What is the rationale behind the decision to keep the generated-site
>>> under our version control?
>> Management and particularly disaster recovery by the infrastructure team,
>> which cannot and will not rebuild the site for every project using
various
>> tools, nor wants to expend the resources (time and computing) while
trying
>> to recover.
> Ok. It makes sense, even if it would be better to have a simple backup
> than a versioned repository for this.
The process will evolve again, I'm sure. The current process dates back to
when we had a single server, and only the one critical copy of the site
contents.
> > The top culprits in our now 111MB site
> You found that 111MB was not right.
Yes, I posted the corrected informaton last night. The 111MB includes 70MB
of SVN overhead. :-)
> It was 42MB and now that I removed the trash from the previous version
> we are to
> 29MB = 1.7MB (website pages) +
> 2.3MB (RFC docs) +
> 15.5MB (javadocs) +
> 9.5MB (cross-references)
Yes, that's not so bad. The only apparent Maven "overhead" is that we now
have the cross-references, which can be useful. So I'm fairly pleased.
Nice job!
--- Noel
