Title: RE: [scoop] what's up with the Slashdot site file?

Hi Guys ,
        How will u unsubscribe this Mail ?
Thanks,
Sudakar.S

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [scoop] what's up with the Slashdot site file?


Bill Janssen said:

> Andy, thanks for the reply.
>
> > But the -mhtml for the BBC World News site means the URL has to be
> > more accurate. I think -html will handle an initial redirect, or
> > something, and -mhtml will not.
>
> That, conceptually, makes no sense to me.  They are both fetching the
> same pages; the difference is in how those pages are stitched
> together.  Why should redirects make a difference?  Don't tell me it's
> two different code bases!

No -- but there's two different ways to handle links for -html and -mhtml.
One turns them into links to named anchors, the other keeps them as links
to pages -- so there's a little conditional code there.

Sounds like there's a bug in -mhtml -- I'll take a peek,

--j.
_______________________________________________
Sitescooper-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/sitescooper-talk

Reply via email to