[2 articles]

Outside Edge:
        Spirit of '69 minus the peace and love

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/04e839f0-1b02-11de-8aa3-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1

By Ludovic Hunter-Tilney
Published: March 27 2009

It is a date the inhabitants of upstate New York have come to dread ­ 
the anniversary of the Woodstock free festival in 1969, when almost 
half a million hippies encamped on a farm in Sullivan County in 
search of a counter-cultural New World.

Commemorative events have duly followed in 1979, 1989, 1994 and 1999. 
The original's ethos of peace and love has not always been observed: 
the 30th anniversary festival, attended by 200,000 people, ended with 
pyromania, looting and rioting. It was, as the 1969 generation would 
say, a bit of a bummer.

Michael Lang, co-founder of the original festival, admitted this week 
that the 1999 concert had "ramifications" but said he thought 
Woodstock's integrity was undamaged. The optimistic Mr Lang is 
searching for $10m sponsorship for a 40th anniversary event, and has 
flagged up Central Park in New York City as a possible venue.

Considering the potential for mayhem, I suspect he has more chance of 
holding it in my back garden than Central Park. But Mr Lang will 
surely find somewhere to stage Woodstock 2009; not just because 
nostalgia is a powerful emotion but also because counter-cultural 
forces are once again stirring.

The original Woodstock boasted an extraordinary line-up, from The Who 
to Jimi Hendrix. Yet it has passed into popular legend for the 
atmosphere as much as the music. The vast numbers attending defied 
inadequate sanitation, rain and dire warnings of social breakdown to 
come together peacefully in ramshackle but functional communal conditions.

Even as the weekend unfolded, its meaning was clear. There were 
almost as many "flower children" present as there were US soldiers in 
Vietnam. Woodstock was not merely an opportunity to take powerful 
hallucinogens and nod along to the Grateful Dead. It was also proof 
that the counter-culture's way of life worked ­ for a long weekend, 
at any rate.

Woodstock's triumph did not last much longer than that. The new 
movement that hippy idealists imagined sweeping the US did not come 
to fruition. Free love, drugs and rock music turned out to be paltry 
weapons against the onward march of global capitalism.

The counter-culture did not disappear, however. It flickered on in 
the anti-globalisation campaigns of the 1990s, and now, after a 
decade of quiescence, is re-emerging with the financial crisis. An 
echo of Woodstock will be heard at next week's Group of 20 protests 
in London, when a miscellany of anti-capitalists, climate-change 
campaigners and anarchists gather to denounce The Man. The question 
is, which Woodstock will the protests echo: the peaceful one of 1969 
or its violent follow-up in 1999?

No doubt Mr Lang's Woodstock sequel, if it happens, will be a more 
sedate affair. He envisages "legacy bands" such as Crosby, Stills and 
Nash reprising their 1969 turns for an audience of dewy-eyed baby 
boomers. But one aspect of his plans chimes pleasingly with the age 
of the credit crunch ­ it won't cost a cent to get in.
--

The writer is the FT's pop critic

-------

Plan for free festival to mark Woodstock's 40th anniversary

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article5963439.ece

March 24, 2009
Ben Hoyle, Arts Correspondent

The original Woodstock festival was the high watermark of Sixties 
flower power, memorable for its music, its nudity and its mellow atmosphere.

The last attempt to revive it, for a 30th anniversary festival in 
1999, ended in chaos with hundreds of police officers called to the 
site to stop rampaging fans from torching the stage and looting the 
overpriced vendors.

Now Michael Lang, the organiser of both events, is risking the 
Woodstock name once again by attempting to put together a free, green 
festival for the 40th anniversary.

All he needs is sponsorship of $10million (£7million) in the next 
three weeks, he told The Times yesterday. "The chances that something 
will happen are probable but I don't really have the answer yet as to 
what that will be," he said.

Central Park and various other outdoor spaces in New York City have 
been scouted and talks have been opened with a distinctly retro 
line-up of bands, including The Who, Santana, Crosby, Stills and 
Nash, Joe Cocker, the Dave Matthews Band and the Red Hot Chili Peppers.

The first four played the original festival. The Who headlined the 
second night, sealing their reputation as a live act in America - 
although Pete Townshend now recalls their performance as "f***ing awful".

The first Woodstock festival was dreamt up by Mr Lang and three other 
people as a profit-making scheme, but such was the turnout that it 
ended up being free to many when the fences were cut.

 From August 15, 1969, an estimated 400,000 people battled through 
epic traffic jams to reach Max Yasgur's dairy farm near Bethel, New 
York State, which had a population of about 3,000.

There they spent three era-defining days sitting around waiting for 
technical hitches to be sorted out, rolling around in the endless mud 
and taking myriad forms of recreational drugs before Jimi Hendrix 
closed the festival by inimitably mangling The Star Spangled Banner 
into an anti-war protest, some time after nine o'clock on the Monday morning.

For the 1994 and 1999 festivals, punters were charged up to $180 per 
ticket, but this time round Mr Lang wants to put on a "free and 
totally green event". Unfortunately, this demands a pragmatic 
approach at odds with the hippy dream.

Speaking about Woodstock 2009 at the South By Southwest music 
festival in Austin, Texas, at the weekend, Mr Lang announced: "It's 
got to be sponsor-driven."

For visitors to the 1999 site this brought back memories of the 
Planet Hollywood restaurants, Woodstock Platinum cards, Budweiser 
beer gardens and $5 bottles of water that rendered laughable the 
comparisons with the shambolic but idealistic original.

Some observers blamed the blatant commercialism of the 1999 festival 
for the unhappy atmosphere that spilt over into rioting on the final 
day. Mr Lang hopes to avoid such problems this time by ensuring that 
his sponsors have "green leanings" and exerting a tighter grip on the 
musical line-up.

"I think what happened in 1999 was a function of the times and the 
music that we booked," he said last night.

"There was a lot of anger around with bands like Limp Bizkit and Korn 
who were heavier than I would have liked. It turned into more of an 
MTV event than a Woodstock event and that was a lesson learnt. This 
time we will go for bands with more of a social conscience."

This summer will be awash with Woodstock nostalgia even if Mr Lang 
fails to get Woodstock 4 off the ground. Ang Lee will have a new film 
out, called Taking Woodstock, about the hotelier who helped to rescue 
the festival by providing a new site for it after the citizens of 
Walkill, New York, blocked it at the 11th hour.

There's also a four-hour director's cut of the concert film 
Woodstock: 3 Days of Peace and Music, which a young Martin Scorsese 
worked on, and a six-CD box set of Woodstock performances to listen 
to after reading Mr Lang's forthcoming book The Road to Woodstock and 
watching the imminent History Channel documentary.
--

Who they came to see in '69

Joan Baez
The Band Blood, Sweat and Tears
Paul Butterfield Blues Band
Canned Heat
Joe Cocker
Country Joe and the Fish
Creedence Clearwater Revival
Crosby, Stills and Nash and Young
Grateful Dead
Arlo Guthrie
Tim Hardin
Richie Havens
Jimi Hendrix
Incredible String Band
Jefferson Airplane
Janis Joplin
Keef Hartley Band
Melanie
Mountain
Quill
Santana
John Sebastian
Sha-Na-Na
Ravi
Shankar
Sly and the Family Stone
Bert Sommer
Sweetwater
Ten Years After
The Who
Johnny Winter

Source: Woodstock69.com

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to