Expert:
        Forty Years Later, the Significance of Woodstock

http://www.smith.edu/newsoffice/releases/NewsOffice09-025.html

April 10, 2009
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NORTHAMPTON, Mass. ­ Look up "Woodstock" using any reference tool and 
the description will likely read "a music and art festival."

But this year, the 40th anniversary of the 1969 event provides a 
moment to reflect upon the significance of "a music and art festival" 
that drew a half million concertgoers to a dairy farm in a rural New York town.

"The anniversary is an occasion to look back on the connection 
between rock music and the counterculture of the 1960s," said Steve 
Waksman, associate professor of music and American studies. "But it's 
also an opportunity to think about the ways in which rock music, or 
any form of music, can create a sense of collective purpose."

Waksman's most recent book "This Ain't the Summer of Love: Conflict 
and Crossover in Heavy Metal and Punk" takes the decline of the 1960s 
counterculture as its starting point. He recently answered questions 
about the historical significance of that rainy, muddy weekend when 
Arlo Guthrie, Joan Baez, Janis Joplin, the Grateful Dead and others 
entertained the masses.

What is the meaning of the anniversary?

The anniversary is an occasion to look back on the connection between 
rock music and the counterculture of the 1960s. In part, it's an 
opportunity to recall a lot of great music and musicians, some of 
whom are no longer with us anymore, such as Jimi Hendrix, and some of 
whom are still very much with us, such as Carlos Santana and Neil 
Young. But it's also an opportunity to think about the ways in which 
rock music, or any form of music, can create a sense of collective 
purpose. To what extent did the roughly half a million people who 
attended Woodstock share a common social or political vision? To what 
extent was their connection grounded in something more than rock 
music itself? These are questions about which it's easy to be either 
nostalgic ("We were all one, man!") or cynical ("Just a bunch of 
hippies getting high and listening to rock!"). The real answer to 
those questions, though, is not a simple one, and it's something to 
take seriously, because it has a lot to tell us about how music 
shapes our values and maybe makes it possible for us to relate to 
each other in ways we wouldn't otherwise.

What was the significance of Woodstock?

The late cultural critic Ellen Willis described Woodstock as the 
culmination of a dream of mass freedom that had arisen in the years 
after World War II and was connected to rock and roll. Mass freedom 
meant that people believed they could best achieve their fullest 
freedom in the context of a group, rather than isolated, as 
individuals. At Woodstock, it was precisely the coming together of so 
many thousands of young people that gave the event its power, and 
that power was at once symbolic and real. People there felt a sense 
of connection, and felt that the connection was tied to something 
bigger than the fact that there was a big rock festival going on. It 
was tied to youth, above all, but it was tied to a particular image 
of youth as a part of the population who could transform the existing 
cultural and political order, could potentially create the basis for 
a culture in which peace was valued over war, in which pleasure was 
valued over productivity, and in which rules and conventions were not 
to be followed if they were found to be corrupt.

At the same time, Woodstock also showed, in a less utopian vein, that 
one could gather enormous crowds of young people together at once and 
not have a catastrophe follow. This was an important lesson for the 
music industry, which at the end of the 1960s was still trying to 
figure out how best to capitalize on the enormous audience that 
existed for rock. After Woodstock, rock concerts grew larger and 
larger in size; there was less need for festivals after a certain 
point, because concerts were routinely happening in arenas and 
stadiums that held thousands, if not tens of thousands, of people. So 
Woodstock also contributed to the further incorporation of rock into 
the profit-making structures of the music industry.

What happened to rock music in the years that followed?

Well, most immediately, about four months after Woodstock came 
Altamont, the large festival outside San Francisco organized by the 
Rolling Stones, which was marked by some bad vibes due to the 
presence of a row of Hell's Angels in front of the stage, and 
culminated in the widely publicized death of a young black man, 
Meredith Hunter. Altamont made the achievement of Woodstock seem to 
many a fluke, and made crowds of young people seem dangerous again. 
The shift from festivals to arena and stadium concerts that occurred 
in the 1970s was in many ways driven by concerns over crowd control 
as much as by concerns over profit. It's easier to maintain order in 
a space that's enclosed and has clear boundaries around it, where 
people sit in rows.

More broadly, rock's connection to its young audience changed. This 
was partly because some of rock's audience was no longer so young; 
people who had come of age through the countercultural years of the 
late 1960s were now entering their 20s and were looking for music 
that was still rock but that was more "mature." Meanwhile, younger 
fans were looking for something they could call their own, and so a 
generation gap of sorts began to emerge within rock rather than 
between rock and other styles of popular music. This is where new 
genres like heavy metal and punk come into play, as forms of rock 
that are still very much concerned with the relationship between rock 
and youth, and that try to reimagine what kinds of communal or 
collective identity rock might create in the wake of the 1960s 
counterculture. That, in effect, is what my new book, "This Ain't the 
Summer of Love," is about.

Office of College Relations
Smith College
Garrison Hall
Northampton, Massachusetts 01063

Kristen Cole
Media Relations Director
T (413) 585-2190
F (413) 585-2174
[email protected]

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to