Book review: 'Who's to Say What's Obscene?'

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/07/27/DDMS18D4OI.DTL

Kevin Smokler, Special to The Chronicle
Monday, July 27, 2009

Who's to Say What's Obscene?
Politics, Culture, and Comedy in America Today
By Paul Krassner
(City Lights Books; 242 pages; $16.95 paperback)

Co-founder of the Yippies, publisher of the infamous satirical 
newspaper the Realist and confidant of Ken Kesey, Paul Krassner, with 
his counterculture resume, needs no validation or burnishing.

After 50 years of kicking the establishment in the shins, his wit may 
be a trusted brand: the "investigative satirist" whose meticulous 
research girds a playful nastiness - but that hasn't driven him to 
comfort, the death knell of his chosen genre.

Instead, a glance at his two magazine columns, blogs for the 
Huffington Post and regular comedy performances reveals that Krassner 
isn't just dusting off old targets but sees the vigilant carping on 
abuses of power as both his daily labor and his legacy.

Which makes it all the more disappointing that Krassner and his 
publisher, City Lights Books, have committed careless acts of 
misappropriation with his new essay collection, "Who's to Say What's 
Obscene? Politics, Culture, and Comedy in America Today."

A laundry basket of dated villains, name-dropping and threadbare 
nostalgia, it should both outrage and reassure us that truths are 
still being stepped on and that Krassner stands guard. But it lets a 
painful truth in through an unlocked window: Satire may be served up 
broad and corny (Mel Brooks), with misplaced dignity (Jonathan Swift) 
or unwavering commitment to a false persona (Stephen Colbert). Yet it 
must have clear targets and an unblinking eye on the present. 
Otherwise, imagine a 2009 smackdown, of say, comic book censorship. A 
satirist looking backward as time marches on is little more than a grouch.

Krassner frontloads his collection of 43 essays with a dozen pieces 
on wrongheaded obscenity cases, seven on silly marijuana laws and an 
inexplicable four on "Sixties bashing" - a social ill on par with 
ticket scalping.

The first two groupings smack of dated self-interest. Exactly how 
topical are obscenity conflicts in an era of ubiquitous Internet 
porn? How selfless are we to take Krassner's blows against the 
anti-pot empire if he spends much of the remainder of the collection 
ticking off the celebrities he smoked out with?

It takes 90 percent of the text for Krassner to arrive at the Patriot 
Act, the 2008 election and President Obama. The placement and 
priority are telling: The author implies the important battles hail 
from long ago while his publisher plays to an imaginary peanut 
gallery of angry Boomers. Neither is well served by reheated outrage 
dressed up like on-deadline social criticism.

Krassner turned 77 this spring. He could rightfully claim a life of 
legend. Instead he marches on, demanding that the powerful explain 
their actions. It is only fair then that we ask him the same, to 
reach the standards he has held for five decades. And sadly, here, he does not.
--

Kevin Smokler is the co-founder of BookTour.com. E-mail him at 
[email protected].

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to