Based on a Truly Gay Story

http://www.advocate.com/issue_story_ektid103464.asp

Forty years ago this summer, two momentous events happened just 100 
miles apart, but they might as well have been on different planets. 
Now the Brokeback Mountain filmmakers have adapted Elliot Tiber's 
memoir, Taking Woodstock, and imbued Woodstock with the spirit of 
Stonewall in a controversial new film -- and it's a comedy.

By David Colman
 From The Advocate  September 2009

In 1969 a pamphlet called the "Gay Scene Guide" bluntly warned 
visitors of a potential hazard of looking for love in Manhattan's 
Greenwich Village. "Do not confuse the 'hippy set' with the 'gay 
set,' " it warned. "There are many hippies in this area, who while 
they may dress in a 'gay' fashion, are actually quite opposed to any 
gay advances."

That spring Elliot Tiber needed no such warning. Though the 
then­34-year-old decorator was a Greenwich Village habitué, he had 
almost no interaction with or interest in hippies -- their values, 
their clothes, their music. The only fragment of culture shared by 
the two factions was, he recalls, "maybe a Janis Joplin song on a 
jukebox in a gay bar."

Then summer rolled around. Its first real weekend began innocently 
enough with drinks at the Stonewall Inn, his favorite Christopher 
Street bar, he says. But when the police showed up for a routine 
raid, Tiber says, he and the other patrons started to rebel, sparking 
a riot that brought hundreds of young gay men into Sheridan Square, 
throwing bottles and overturning police cars. The night changed his 
life forever.

By contrast, the other happening that summer that Tiber also helped 
bring to life -- the three-day congregation of hippiedom known as 
Woodstock -- seemed to change the world before it even began. The 
panicked weeks and mounting insanity leading up to the concert, 
during which Tiber -- through a series of stranger-than-fiction 
circumstances -- came to the festival's rescue by offering a 
last-minute venue and permit, were the subject of his charming if 
scattered 2007 memoir, Taking Woodstock. Now, with a script by Focus 
Features CEO James Schamus, the tale has been adapted into an 
intriguing new film of the same name directed by Ang Lee. Cutting out 
Stonewall and Tiber's gay city life but reframing the hippie 
free-love credo to include gays, the film melds the spirit of the two 
disparate events into one moving tale. Starring breakout comic actor 
and writer Demetri Martin as Tiber, the film opens August 28.

The film completes a kind of gay trilogy for Lee and Schamus, both of 
whom, incidentally, are happily married to women. Lee directed The 
Wedding Banquet and Brokeback Mountain; Schamus's Focus Features 
produced Brokeback and Milk. But it wasn't the memoir's gay main 
character that first drew Lee to the project, it was Tiber himself, 
whom Lee first encountered on an early-morning news show.

"I had done six tragedies in a row," Lee says. "The last straw was 
Lust, Caution -- that took a lot of out of me. For years I had been 
wanting to do something more warmhearted, a comedy, and it just 
happened that when I was promoting Lust, Caution in San Francisco, 
Elliot Tiber was the next guest, and he gave me this two-minute pitch 
and gave me the book."

The director didn't bite right away, though -- and he lost the book. 
And when Tiber didn't hear back from him, he tracked down Schamus 
instead and won him over.

Tiber's tenaciousness is easy to imagine. Though he spent a good deal 
of the past 40 years living alternately in New York and Belgium with 
André Ernotte, a Belgian playwright and director who died in 1999, 
Tiber, now 74, still comes across as both a born-in-Bensonhurst New 
Yorker and a curious hybrid of Mae West and Mel Brooks. His outsize 
life and personality jump off the pages of his book as well, with 
tales of studying painting with Hans Hofmann, S/M sex with Robert 
Mapplethorpe, and an ambiguously amorous evening with Marlon Brando, 
all cropping up before his story even gets upstate. The book 
contains, as Schamus dryly says, "enough for 20 movies."

But Schamus and Lee decided to focus only on the central thread, 
dispensing with many of the most blatantly Jewish and gay facets of 
Tiber's story. (Imagine what the MPAA would have done with a scene of 
Elliot, who is Jewish, going home with Mapplethorpe from a leather 
bar to find a mammoth Nazi banner hanging in the photographer's 
loft­and then still staying the night.)

The story that emerged is like that of Norman Bates with a happy 
ending: Miserable, eccentric gay man with a crippling sexual 
self-hatred is saddled with a domineering mother -- and her bankrupt 
hotel -- but still ends up saving the day. The similarity to real 
life ends there. In 1969, Tiber worked in New York City as a 
decorator and painter and spent his weekends in White Lake, N.Y., in 
an effort to keep his parents' failing motel afloat with various 
schemes -- a pool! An amateur theater troupe! An annual music 
festival! All flopped. The motel was on the verge of foreclosure in 
July, when Tiber happened to read that an actual music festival had 
just lost its permit in Wallkill, N.Y. So Tiber, who already had a 
permit for festival he was planning, picked up the phone and offered 
his help. That first phone call set off a chain of occurrences: His 
neighbor's farm became the venue, and his parents' motel was taken 
over (and the mortgage cares erased) by the event's planners, who 
made it their headquarters. So too did VW busloads of free spirits, 
who started arriving in White Lake weeks before the festival's 
kickoff. The film is essentially a 1930s-style screwball comedy about 
a drowning man who called for help -- and Woodstock showed up.

"The Elliot Tiber in the movie, played by Demetri, was something I 
think I created with [Schamus]," Lee says, explaining how Tiber's 
campy persona was transformed for the film version into what 
comedians call the "straight man." Not a hetero, mind you, but an 
average guy the audience can identify with as the madness of 
Woodstock mounts. "We love the idea that our hero is a kind of 
everyman," Schamus says. "Can't gay men be everymen too?" Lee found a 
familiar character in the source material, one with whom he is 
well-acquainted: the passionate but ambivalent person forced by 
circumstance to make a move or a stand or a choice he doesn't want 
to, like Bruce Banner filled with radioactive rage in Hulk or the 
conflicted cowboy lovers in Brokeback Mountain.

"Americans like heroes," he says. "Americans like people who take 
sides. That's not so true for me. I identify with these characters 
trying to keep an absolute balance, who tolerate a lot to keep things 
safe and all right. These characters cannot make decisions. They're 
unable to offend anyone. That's their charm and their weakness."

The idea of the music festival as a comedic and miraculous deus ex 
machina appealed to Lee, who had first started seriously researching 
Woodstock and the culture that sparked it when he made his 1997 film 
The Ice Storm, which, set among jaded liberals in a Connecticut 
suburb in 1973, he came to think of as "kind of a hangover from 1969."

But reading about Tiber's experience made him want to explore the 
idealism that the event represented. In the summer of 1969, Lee was 
14 and living in the highly repressive culture of Taiwan. He recalls 
kids with long hair being forced off the street to have it shorn. In 
this world Lee was only dimly aware of hippies and Woodstock, but he 
had his own growing feelings of being trapped inside and outside of 
tradition. These feelings only intensified when he decided to be a 
filmmaker, which won him no approval from his scholarly family. "It 
was kind of a disgrace," he says. The unfairness and hypocrisy of the 
system were what he took square aim at with his early comedy The 
Wedding Banquet.

Now, having re-created the festival (on a limited budget and with the 
help of computer animation that turned 6,000 extras into 500,000), 
Lee says he still feels the infectious hippie optimism, even more 
than before he started the film. "They planted the seeds for many 
good things and pointed out a lot of issues that we take more 
seriously today," he says. "The fact that half a million people were 
there and there was no violence is amazing. Something like that will 
probably never happen again. The idea that the world can be changed 
overnight, that's the naive part. But the heart and the intention 
that held it together was quite incredible."

Still, for all of the festival's good points, and for its 
coincidental timing with the Stonewall rebellion, Lee says he's aware 
that the demographics and values of Woodstock's attendees had very 
little overlap with those of the gay rights movement. Only this year, 
in the revival of the 1967 free-love Broadway hit Hair, has the 
character of Woof been rewritten to be clearly gay. And only recently 
did the musical's cocreator James Rado reveal that he and his writing 
partner for the show, Gerome Ragni, were lovers in the 1960s.

Over breakfast in a posh West Village café the morning after Gay 
Pride, Tiber recalls that when the film was completed, Lee and 
Schamus organized a screening for him. Schamus and Lee waited outside 
the screening room for Tiber, and after he exited with his face wet 
with tears, they asked, "Don't you like it?" Tiber remembers. "I 
said, 'Are you kidding? It's so beautiful and so moving and so 
touching.' That's when they told me that they were grateful to tell 
this story of this gay man with all these problems who not only 
survived but came out on top and changed the world.'"

At the end of the film, Elliot, played with wonderful restraint and 
subdued eccentricity by Martin, bids adieu to his parents and heads 
off to San Francisco, the land of Harvey Milk and the future of the 
gay rights movement. In real life Tiber bought a Cadillac and moved 
to Los Angeles to get a job in the movies. The film's rendering of 
him is certainly less flamboyant than the true-life man. Sure, the 
truth is more real -- it always is. Though the anger of Stonewall and 
its bricks and bottles are not in the film, its spirit of liberation 
is very much felt. As if answering a call, the anarchic joy of 
Woodstock swoops down to bestow a kiss on a lonely gay frog prince, 
and it sets him free. However you slice it, it's an awfully nice fairy tale.

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to