The Manson Murders at 40

http://www.newsweek.com/id/209940

'Helter Skelter' author Vincent Bugliosi looks back.

Aug 1, 2009

The leaves were turning on the summer of love. Vietnam was droning 
on. Racial unrest was rising. And then, it happened: a crime so 
heinous, it sent shock waves through the country that are still 
palpable today. The Manson "family" murders are more than grisly 
crimes. They marked the close of an era. As Joan Didion wrote in her 
memoir of the time, The White Album, the '60s "ended abruptly on 
August 9, 1969," the evening Sharon Tate and four others were 
brutally slaughtered in cold blood, a night before another round of 
senseless killing claimed two more lives.

Vincent Bugliosi, the chief prosecutor in the case, secured 
first-degree murder convictions against Manson and his codefendants; 
the jury returned verdicts of death, which were subsequently reduced 
to life imprisonment when California set aside the death penalty in 
1972. Bugliosi went on to co-author a book about the case with Curt 
Gentry titled Helter Skelter (after the Beatles song name printed in 
blood at one of the murder scenes), which became, according to his 
publisher, the bestselling true-crime book of all time. Bugliosi 
spoke with NEWSWEEK's Tom Watson on the eve of the 40th anniversary 
of the Manson murders about what it was like to prosecute the case, 
and why Manson's chaotic charisma continues to attract global 
attention to this day.

Watson: Set the scene for us. What was the mood of the country, and 
of Los Angeles, on the eve of the Manson murders?
Bugliosi: I can't speak for the rest of the country, but I can tell 
you that in L.A., it was a time of relative innocence. I've heard 
many people say that prior to these murders, there were areas of the 
city where folks literally did not lock their doors at night. That 
ended with the Tate-LaBianca murders. The killings were so terribly 
brutal and savage: 169 stab wounds, seven gunshot wounds. They 
appeared to be random, with no discernible conventional motive. That 
induced a lot of fear throughout the city of Los Angeles, 
particularly in Bel Air and Beverly Hills, the heart of the movie 
colony, where the Tate murders happened (the LaBianca murders 
happened across town, near Griffith Park). Names were dropped from 
guest lists. Parties were canceled. No one knew if the killers were 
among them. Overnight, the sale of guns and guard dogs rose dramatically.

Why did the crimes penetrate so deeply in the American psyche? How 
did the culture change in the immediate aftermath?
I was just involved prosecuting one murder case after another, so I'm 
not someone who's a sociologist. But the killings tapped a feeling of 
dread … if you're not safe in your own home, where are you safe? And 
the very thought of young women dressed in black, armed with sharp 
knives, entering the homes of complete strangers in the middle of the 
night and mercilessly stabbing them to death … it's difficult to even 
contemplate a thought like that.
The other thing that terrified the nation so much is when the 
identity of the killers became known. And who were they? Young kids 
from average American homes with fairly good backgrounds. There was a 
feeling that this could be our own children. Tex Watson, Manson's 
"chief lieutenant" at the murder scene, was from Farmersville, Texas, 
hometown of World War II hero Audie Murphy. Watson was a football, 
basketball, and track star. He had almost an A average in high 
school. And when the people in Farmersville learned he was being 
charged with these murders, the general consensus was this is 
absolutely impossible, it must be a case of mistaken identity. 
Patricia Krenwinkel­another one of the main killers­her father was an 
insurance executive; she sang in the church choir; got good grades in 
school; at one time she even wanted to attend a Jesuit college in 
Alabama. Leslie Van Houten­another killer­she was a homecoming 
princess at Monrovia High School here in L.A.

How did Manson seduce these kids?
Manson is this 5-foot-2 guru with a long and checkered criminal 
history. He gets out of Terminal Island federal penitentiary off Long 
Beach, Calif., in 1967, goes up to the Haight-Ashbury district of San 
Francisco. He's got his guitar, and his street rap, and he sings­a 
pretty good composer of music, by the way. Guns N' Roses and the 
Beach Boys have recorded Manson songs. So he mesmerizes these young 
kids and tells them things they can identify with­about the need for 
the preservation of wildlife, that there's pollution of the 
environment by big corporations, that the poor man's fighting the 
rich man's war in Vietnam …. Their lifestyle was sex orgies and LSD 
trips. He convinces them he's the second coming of Christ and the 
devil all wrapped up into one person, and ultimately, as you know, he 
gets them to kill for him. He tells them the purpose for these 
murders is to start a war between blacks and whites, which he called 
Helter Skelter, after the Beatles song.

Fast-forward to the trial. What was the atmosphere at the courthouse, 
and the most dramatic moments in prosecuting the case?
It was the longest murder trial we'd ever had in America up to that 
point: nine months. And it was the most expensive up to that point, 
at $1 million. Outside the courthouse, there was a group of Manson 
family members conducting a 24-hour-a-day vigil for him. The media 
was interviewing them every day. Manson came into court one day with 
an X carved into his forehead, and the next day they all had X's on 
their foreheads. One day during the trial, he got ahold of a sharp 
pencil, and from a standing position, he leaps over the counsel's 
table with this pencil and starts approaching the judge. The bailiffs 
immediately tackled him and, as they were dragging him out of the 
courtroom, he shouted to the judge: "In the name of Christian 
justice, someone should chop off your head." The judge started 
carrying a .38-caliber revolver under his robe in court after that.

Even President Nixon got into the act. He was in Denver at a 
law-enforcement convention. He gives his opinion that he thought 
Manson was guilty. Ronald Ziegler, his press secretary, tried 
afterward to correct that, saying that the president meant to say 
allegedly guilty. But it had gone out over the wires. The main 
headline in the Los Angeles Times: MANSON GUILTY, NIXON DECLARES. 
Manson got ahold of that paper­no one knows how­stands up in front of 
the jury with a little silly grin on his face, and shows the jury the 
headline. It was almost as if he was somehow proud the president had 
taken notice.

Then near the end of the trial, a defense attorney vanishes from the 
face of the earth. Ronald Hughes was the defense attorney for 
codefendant Leslie Van Houten. The judge said, "Well, we're going to 
have to be in recess." Every morning we were hoping that poor Hughes 
would walk through the courtroom door, but he never did. So the judge 
had to appoint a substitute lawyer to take his place. On the last day 
of the trial, Hughes's body was found out in the forest, but the 
Ventura County coroner's office was unable to determine the cause of 
death because of the decomposition … I can't say positively one way 
or the other, but my leaning is that Hughes was murdered by the Manson family.

Give us an example of how widespread the interest in the case has 
been over the years.
Let me tell you a story. Years ago, I spoke at a book convention in 
Richmond, Va. I arrived at the station at the same time as William 
Manchester and Arthur Schlesinger, both Pulitzer Prize winners. The 
whole cab ride, Manchester and Schlesinger are tossing me questions 
about Charles Manson. That's all they wanted to talk about: tell me 
about him. Tell me about his eyes. Did you ever talk to him? How did 
he get control over these people?

Have you talked with Manson since the trial?
No. He wrote me four letters. I didn't respond to any of them; I 
turned them over to the Department of Corrections... The latest one 
could have been 20 years ago. [Bugliosi declined to discuss the 
letters' contents.]

Leslie Van Houten comes up for parole soon. Have you ever gone to a 
hearing for one of the family members?
No. If it came down to a point where they were seriously considering 
releasing, let's say, Manson or Watson, I would intervene­not that I 
have any clout at all. But I would write to the governor. But it's 
not going to happen.

Place Manson in the pantheon of American criminal outlaws.
Most mass murderers have turned out to be of rather low 
intellect­drifters, loners. Basically, they committed the murders for 
one reason only: to satisfy their own homicidal tendencies. Manson 
not only is very bright­but as misdirected as his violence was, his 
murders were revolutionary, political, and therein lies his main 
appeal to those on the fringes. The other thing that has separated 
him is the fact that all these other mass murderers committed the 
murders by themselves. Manson, on the other hand, was pulling strings 
and getting people to go out and kill strangers at his command 
without asking any questions. And that makes him more frightening to people.

And people are frightened of his impact still.
Let me just read to you a letter I received from the BBC in 1994. 
This reporter wrote to me about many British and German rock bands 
playing Manson songs and songs in support of him. "For some reason 
the neo-Manson cult seems to center in Manchester, where there are 
five stores selling 'Free Charles Manson' t-shirts, which are 
fantastically popular on rave dance floors, and bootleg records of 
his music...The majority of the supporters of these bands are under 
25. The truly frightening part is that many, when asked, turned out 
to be Manson buffs who have read all they can find about Manson, and 
strongly approve of 'Helter Skelter.'" That was 15 years ago, but 
Manson is still big.

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to