Society Meets The Sixties

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203706604574371522977817250.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

The aristos flock to a party. The brownies are spiked with hashish.

AUGUST 30, 2009
By MARTIN RUBIN

Anyone who has seen "Gosford Park" (2001) knows that Julian Fellowes, 
the movie's screenwriter, has a knack for mocking the foibles of the 
British ­upper crust. In his novel "Snobs" (2005) he skewered the 
inhabitants of the same milieu even more savagely. "Past Imperfect" 
shows Mr. Fellowes's satirical talents to be undiminished. Here, 
though, he offers a rounded portrait of an aristocratic gratin 
fighting to preserve its customs and defend its turf.

Mr. Fellowes chooses his moment carefully­­precisely a decade after 
Queen Elizabeth II had ­summarily ended the ceremonies at which young 
ladies were presented at court. Until 1958, this rite of passage was 
the sine qua non for debutantes. How, in the new dispensation, were 
aristocratic parents (and parvenus) going to marry off their progeny? 
"Past Imperfect" ­offers a portrait of Society in 1968, unwilling to 
yield to democratic norms and fighting to ­retain its habits and mores.

The effort now centers on a charity ball held at­how the mighty have 
fallen!­a hotel, albeit a grand one on London's fashionable Park 
Lane. "There was hardly a parent there," Mr. ­Fellowes writes of the 
event, "who thought their daughters' future would be anything more 
than an extended repeat of their own present. How can they have been 
so secure in their expectations? Didn't it occur to them that more 
change might be on its way? After all, their generation had lived 
through enough of it to push the world off its axis."

The novel's whirl of parties and dances takes place in London's 
fabled Swinging Sixties, and some of the era's telltale iconography 
makes an appearance. The ­first-person narrator, a student at 
Cambridge at the time and now recalling his youth, notes that part of 
British culture in the 1960s was "about pop and drugs and happenings, 
and Marianne Faithfull and Mars Bars and free love." But another part 
looked back to a ­traditional England, "where behaviour was laid down 
according to the practice of, if not many centuries, at least the 
century immediately before, where everything from clothes to sexual 
morality was rigidly determined and, if we did not always obey the 
rules, we knew what they were."

The view of this social class in "Past Imperfect" is often less than 
flattering. By the late 1960s, its ­members are nervous about their 
status, toying with "the new" and, as ever, eager for the money to 
keep up appearances. The men still dress in white tie, and even know 
when it is right to wear it, though ever fewer ­people care. Other 
customs threaten to fall away. A ­debutante attempts to attend the 
races at Ascot but is forbidden admission because she 
is­shockingly­­wearing trousers. She decides to remove them on the 
spot, sending nearby photographers into a frenzy. "I suppose I can 
come in now," she says calmly to the bow-tied gateman. "I suppose you 
can," he ­answers. Later in the story, an American heiress­the 
family's name is Vitkov­arrives in London and tries to crash London 
society by renting Madame Tussauds, of all places. The aristos flock 
to her party even so, ­consuming the brownies that are handed around 
­without quite grasping, until it is too late, that they have been 
spiked with hashish by a spiteful guest.

The novel's narrator, a member of the aristocratic class himself, is 
aware of its foolish side but cannot feel happy about what eventually 
comes to replace the old order. He observes that a new and affluent 
group is now living the high life, but its members "do not, unlike 
their predecessors a century ago, take much ­responsibility for those 
less blessed. This new breed feel no heed to lead the public in public."

Mr. Fellowes, it should be said, is not merely ­committing sociology 
in "Past Imperfect." He offers a narrative crowded with incident and 
memorable ­characters. The device by which he builds his story­a 
dying billionaire entrusts the narrator with a quest to discover 
which one of a half-dozen ladies gave birth to his only heir­is a 
trifle contrived. But it does give Mr. Fellowes the chance to romp 
through bedroom and ­ballroom, not to mention down memory lane. A 
­disastrous dinner party referred to throughout the novel­think 
shattered crockery and illusions­is not described in full until near 
the end. Even after all that build-up, it proves worth the wait.

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to