Film Review:
        The Most Dangerous Man in America:
                Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers

http://www.filmjournal.com/filmjournal/content_display/reviews/specialty-releases/e3i0d1b247e2040d9db18b8118db69b132a

This straightforward history lesson casts Daniel Ellsberg and his 
leaked Pentagon Papers as the first shot in the war that brought down 
the Nixon regime.

Sept 1, 2009
By Chris Barsanti

For movie details, please click here.
http://directories.vnuemedia.com/fjiguides/bluesheets/film_display.aspx?mid=10541

After seeing Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith's earnest, smart 
documentary about Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers 
controversy, viewers not old enough when it unfolded might wonder why 
the story has played such a minor role in popular histories of the 
era. This informative account deserves more than the very limited 
theatrical release it's likely to get.

Ellsberg's story (which he narrates large parts of) is similar to 
that of many intellectuals recruited into Washington's cadre of 
wunderkinds only to find themselves with the blood of Vietnam all 
over their hands. Brilliant and competitive, Ellsberg was a top 
policy analyst in the military-industrial complex more interested in 
game theory and puzzle-solving than waging war. Symbolically, the 
Gulf of Tonkin incident erupted on his very first day at the Pentagon 
under Robert McNamara.

 From then on, Ellsberg­a lean and professorial type with a David 
Strathairn gravity to him­was propelled deeper and deeper into 
planning of the war he later came to despise. A true-blue 
anti-communist and former Marine, Ellsberg was no desk wonk, but 
headed into the South Vietnamese deltas and jungles to dig up data 
firsthand, even if it meant going into actual combat. Ellsberg 
ultimately learned enough about the war­particularly how badly it was 
going and how inhumanely it was being fought­that he couldn't ignore 
his doubts any longer.

Though their visuals tend toward hokey reenactments and no-frills 
talking-head dialogue, the filmmakers do an astounding job relating 
how Ellsberg brought the Pentagon Papers (which laid out in plain 
language how the Pentagon and White House had been lying through 
their teeth to the public about the war) to light. From smuggling the 
thousands of top-secret documents out of the Rand Corporation, to the 
breathtaking race to publish them in more newspapers than the 
government could get injunctions against (vitriolic audiotapes reveal 
a vicious Nixon raging in full splutter, "We've got to get this son 
of a bitch!"), it's a thrilling journalistic drama, easily the equal 
of Deep Throat.

If nothing else, The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg 
and the Pentagon Papers (the title comes from Henry Kissinger) 
strongly makes the point that without Ellsberg's breach in the dam, 
Nixon might never have been paranoid enough to get his team of 
plumbers to raid Ellsberg's doctor's office, which laid the 
groundwork for their later break-ins at the Watergate.

Although visually a minimally budgeted public television-style 
documentary (if only Errol Morris had wanted to tell Ellsberg's story 
as a follow-up to The Fog of War), The Most Dangerous Man offers a 
brisk and eye-opening approach to recent history.

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to