[2 articles]

Goodbye Hello: Beatlemania 2009

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/goodbye-hello-beatlemania-2009-1782398.html

They formed five decades ago, broke up 40 years back, and this week 
they will attract a new audience. Author and historian Simon Wells investigates

Sunday, 6 September 2009

The Beatles ­ yes, it's them again. This once peculiar, slightly 
corny word coined by John Lennon has now endured almost 50 years of 
passionate usage. While there may have been a few occasions on which 
someone has dared to question the group's seemingly limitless appeal, 
here we are once more with yet another resurgence expected just 
around the corner. And if you haven't already noticed, Wednesday sees 
the release of the entire Beatles studio catalogue, digitally 
remastered from the original session tapes, no less. And if that 
weren't enough, a new computer game, The Beatles: Rock Band, hits the 
shelves the very same day. While it's probably overstating the case 
somewhat to suggest that shopkeepers are boarding up their windows 
for the anticipated rush, it's a certainty that the interest from all 
quarters will be nothing less than colossal.

While to some, the release of the Beatles' remastered CDs is long 
overdue, it is computer game that will pull in the bulk of new 
admirers. Purists (myself included) may find the thought of 
computerised Mop Tops somewhat incongruous, but such jaundiced 
opinions will mean little to the comfort-funsters who'll no doubt 
enjoy dancing around their living rooms, plastic guitars hanging 
round their necks. With the teasing addition of 45 Beatles songs 
specially lent for the project, one can only imagine that many will 
be queuing up (or at least tapping into Amazon) to complete their 
collection of CDs once they tire of the game.

To add further excitement to the digital maniacs' already overloaded 
senses, it has been hinted that the computer game will allow for the 
long-awaited transfer of the Beatles catalogue as a downloadable product.

But before we all get too carried away, we've been here before ­ 
quite a few times. The first Beatles CD releases in 1987 sent 
cartloads of vinyl to the local Oxfam shops, while sales of compact 
disc players rocketed. The Beatles Anthology, ostensibly the last 
word on the phenomenon in 1995, generated six CDs of unreleased 
material, a hefty book, several T-shirts and a library of unreleased 
videos. In between these well-hyped unveilings, we've had the odd 
re-released film, radio sessions and greatest hits compilations to 
keep the kettle boiling.

To the cynical, all this may seem to be just another ploy to reline 
the pockets of those who are already far too wealthy; and yet the 
reality (sad or otherwise) is that, five decades on, no one has yet 
to claim the mantle donned by the Beatles.

In fact, most have now given up trying. For a while, following the 
group's split in 1970, many attempted to steal their enormous 
fanbase. The cuddly Osmonds and tartan-clad Bay City Rollers were 
just two of many who had a go, and while they accrued something of 
Beatlemania, their appeal was largely ephemeral. Over the following 
years, others were driven to try to emulate the Beatles' 
stratospheric success, but came away with little more than a few hits 
and a hefty tax bill.

Showing little shame, Oasis would borrow heavily from the Fab Four's 
wardrobe and songbook, yet they were never going to acquire any of 
their global appeal. Ironically, understanding this enduring 
supremacy is also beyond the two remaining Beatles, who despite the 
constant reminders of their glory days, appear as mystified by it all 
as the rest of us.

Indeed, the group's bemusement at the Beatles phenomenon was evident 
as early as 1963. If you have the stamina to sit through the hours of 
Beatles-related films, you might come across a little-seen featurette 
entitled The Mersey Sound. Made by the BBC in mid-1963, the 30-minute 
show devoted a large part of its time to the Beatles, by then the 
newest craze on the fledgling pop roundabout. From a 21st-century 
point of view, the film appears curious and dated; but, in watching 
these four awkward youngsters struggling to come to terms with their 
extraordinary fame, it is a fascinating piece of television.

Probably aware that the group would elevate themselves beyond novelty 
status, the BBC allowed each individual Beatle a few moments to 
expand on the future. The lads' answers are quite amusing in their modesty.

John Lennon: "How long are we going to last? Well, you can't say. You 
can be big-headed and say, 'Yeah, we're going to last 10 years', but 
as soon as you've said that, you think: we're lucky if we last three months."

George Harrison: "I hope to have enough money to go into a business 
of my own by the time we do flop. We don't know: it may be next week, 
it may be two or three years, but I think we'll be in the business, 
either up there or down there, for the next four years."

Paul McCartney: "Well, obviously we can't keep playing this same sort 
of music until we're about 40. Old men playing 'From Me to You'; 
nobody's going to want to know about that sort of thing ... Who 
knows, at 40 we might not be able to write songs any more."

Ringo Starr: "I've always fancied having a ladies' hairdressing 
salon, a string of them in fact. Trot around in my stripes and tails 
saying, 'Like a cup of tea, madam?'"

Despite these largely self-effacing comments, within a few short 
months Beatlemania had fully conquered Britain. By the end of 1964, 
America had also fallen to the group's young, fun and carefree ethos. 
The world, starved of such joyous abandon in the post-war years, 
easily took the bait. It is said that the associated Beatles 
merchandising industry took in over $100m in two years ­ yet largely 
through ineptitude and innocence, the Beatles saw very little of it.

Nonetheless, the band continued to ascend the dizzy heights of 
success. Their MBEs, collected at an investiture at Buckingham Palace 
in November 1965, was confirmation that they had conquered every 
level of society. They were the world's favourite "children": adored, 
adorned and adulated wherever they went.

But behind the masks of passive acceptance lay deep resentment. 
Lennon, especially, hated society's fawning over the group and 
yearned for newer, more creative pastures where he could explore 
fully the surreal bohemia he adored.

One fundamental change in the band's way of thinking was fuelled by 
their insatiable ingestion of marijuana. Soon, LSD would transform 
the group into full-blown musical extraterrestrials, sending them 
well outside the monochrome world in which the rest of the population 
laboured. These seeds so freely scattered into the fertile and 
receptive imagination of the world's youth began to blossom during 
the tail end of 1966.

Naturally, the Beatles were at the forefront of the new hippie 
movement and they freely promoted the nebulous but appealing 
manifesto of love and peace. Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, 
the album that best reflects the spirit of the "Summer of Love" of 
1967, helped to win more serious musical aficionados over to the Beatles.

Reality, however, drove a wedge through the psychedelic landscape in 
August of that year, with the news that the band's manager, Brian 
Epstein, had died from a drug overdose. After his death, the extent 
of his pitiful handling of their finances quickly became apparent.

Their first attempt at managerless autonomy was the film Magical 
Mystery Tour. Broadcast on Boxing Day 1967, its quirky psychedelia 
unwittingly gave the press their first chance to ignite a backlash 
against a band that had hitherto known only success and adulation. 
Even so, the accompanying soundtrack scored them yet another worldwide hit.

In an attempt to regain control over their own finances in the wake 
of Epstein's death, the group established Apple, a record 
label-cum-artistic clearing house, which was mainly the brainchild of 
Paul McCartney. With no other source of direction, the rest of the 
group followed McCartney's brief, chivvied along by their accountants 
saying that something had to be done about the crippling amounts of 
tax they were paying. In the spirit of the times, Apple was an 
imaginative, if wholly idealistic, concept. However, within two short 
years, it did little more than prove the point that while the Beatles 
were extraordinary musicians and writers, they were not cut out to be 
businessmen.

Nonetheless, the upheaval behind the scenes had little effect on the 
quality of their music. The White Album and Abbey Road sold millions 
of copies worldwide, and while the free-range antics of John Lennon 
and Yoko Ono caused consternation among some erstwhile fans, the 
Beatles' music remained impregnable.

The band's break-up in early 1970 was, to an extent, something of an 
anticlimax. While the world attempted to come to terms with the 
extraordinary events of the 1960s, the Beatles were sidelined ­ a new 
era of flares, perms and punk rock was on the verge of being born. 
Ironically, it took the death of John Lennon in 1980 to kick-start 
the group's perpetual renaissance; something that continues to roll. 
Despite its formative blip, Apple Records is a tightly run ship 
today, and to its credit it has taken care not to saturate the market 
with Beatles products. Ultimately, these new CD remasters and the 
Rock Band computer game will inspire countless more words. Yet like 
many, I doubt that we will ever tire of the Beatles.
--

The pretenders: Fab Four are still the band to beat

There will never be another Beatles ­ fact. But that hasn't stopped 
legions of young pretenders trying to claim their throne over the 
years. The Osmonds were up there when it came to a squeaky-clean 
image, energetic pop-rock sound and legions of fans, yet 
"Osmondmania" was hardly akin to "Beatlemania" and only people of a 
certain age can remember any of their songs. The Aussie rockers AC/DC 
certainly don't look or play like the Beatles, but when it comes to 
number of albums sold, they're hard on their heels. Duran Duran had 
the looks, the fans and the new sound ­ but that new sound was 
distinctly Eighties and hasn't aged well. In the Nineties Take That 
had an army of screaming fans and several number-one hits under their 
belts. Yet for all his shiny pop tunes, Gary Barlow was no Paul 
McCartney, and they never produced anything to match the White Album. 
Oasis, on the other hand, played all their own instruments, had mop 
tops and hailed from the North... but they couldn't shake off the 
criticism that all they did was rip off the Beatles. What's more, all 
their albums sounded exactly like their debut, Definitely Maybe. So 
who next? Perhaps four young mop-topped scamps named Arctic Monkeys 
will provide the longevity lacking from today's groups. Or perhaps we 
should just give up hoping and enjoy what they left.

The Jonas Brothers? Not likely, says Simmy Richman on page 52. You 
wouldn't catch them smoking a spliff in the Queen's loos ­ plus 
they're American.

Paul Bignell
--

Beatles in numbers

74m The number of people who tuned in to watch the Fab Four on The Ed 
Sullivan Show in America in 1964

1,400 The number of concerts the band played during only six years 
spent touring

13 Studio albums produced in the 10 years the Beatles were together

1bn One estimate of the band's total record sales

--------

Get back: It's Beatlemania all over again

http://www.miamiherald.com/living/story/1217848.html

BY JORDAN LEVIN
[email protected]
09.06.09

As it turns out, all you need is love -- and genius -- to live 
forever, even in the evanescent world of pop music. For the Beatles, 
the time is not just When I'm 64 but any age at all. The renowned 
British quartet's career lasted from 1962 to 1969, but their music 
has spanned generations.

Their longevity means that the much-anticipated, completely 
remastered Beatles catalog -- all 13 British albums -- to be released 
on Wednesday, comes at just the right time. The date, 9/9/09, is a 
wink at the group's famously mystifying song Revolution 9, and it 
coincides with the launch of The Beatles: Rock Band video game.

On a technical level, the release was long overdue: the Beatles' 
recordings hadn't been remastered since they were first released on 
CD in 1987, and the years since have seen enormous advances in sound 
and recording techniques. But it also appears at a time when the band 
is more beloved and influential than ever.

``I don't think they're relevant again. I think they're relevant, 
period,'' says Aramis Lorie, co-producer and DJ for Pop Life, Miami's 
popular alternative music party, where he recently fired up a dance 
floor of 20-somethings with the Beatles' Taxman. ``It's a timeless 
thing. They're still influential, and they'll be influential for a long time.''

Although the Beatles are closely associated with the musical and 
cultural changes of the 1960s, their music is even more popular now. 
A recent Pew Research Center poll found that the group was among the 
top four favorite musical artists for every age group from 16 to over 
65. In fact, while the Beatles rated tops with boomers 50 to 64, they 
were the second most popular act for fans 16 to 29.

And those stats don't even include the next generation of music 
lovers, such as the young cousin of South Florida songwriter Jacob 
Jeffries who, for most of her childhood, was lulled to sleep by the 
buoyant psychedelica of Yellow Submarine.

``In my whole life I've met one person who said that the Beatles 
aren't that great -- and I immediately dismissed her from my life,'' 
says Jeffries, 21, who grew up immersed in the Beatles (his mother 
was a huge fan) and whose first songs, written when he was 7, were 
modeled on theirs. ``They represent the whole spectrum of pop music.''

Indeed, the Beatles affected almost every aspect of popular music and 
recording technology. Their songwriting, whether early gems or 
genre-expanding later songs, set the template for pop music, and they 
still influence artists from The Pussycat Dolls to Juanes.

Their constant experimentation in the studio vastly expanded the 
palette of recording technology.

``You can like it or not, but in the end, whether you know it or not, 
you're doing something they already did and had a hand in laying the 
groundwork for,'' says Sebastian Krys, 2007 Latin Grammy Producer of 
the Year. ``You have to basically start over to not be influenced by 
the Beatles if you're a musician, just in the way you record or the 
way a song is structured.''

The re-release aims to capture all the Beatles' achievements. A team 
of engineers worked on the project for four years, transferring 
master recordings on tape, cleaning up noise and bringing out details 
of the original sound. Especially on later records such as Sgt. 
Pepper, the result is a newly audible wealth of instruments and 
effects. Even earlier albums sound brighter, fresher and more alive.

The CDs come with the original British artwork and liner notes, plus 
new historical photos and essays, and, for a limited period, an 
embedded mini-documentary to watch on computer. The catalog, with a 
DVD of the documentaries, is available as a box set for $259.98; 
there's also a limited-edition mono box set for $298.98.

Fun details highlight the notes and documentaries. We learn that the 
Beatles debut, Please Please Me, was recorded in slightly less than 
10 hours, that the title A Hard Day's Night was one of Ringo's 
frequent verbal stumbles. In the films you hear the Beatles 
chattering in the studio and famed producer George Martin's remembrances.

In the DVD documentary on Magical Mystery Tour, John Lennon's 
explanation of his famously mysterious I Am the Walrus succinctly 
captures the band's' philosophy. ``It has enough little bitties going 
to keep you interested 100 years later,'' Lennon says. ``What does it 
mean `I am the eggman'? It could have been a pudding base, for all I 
cared. It was tongue-in-cheek. It's not that serious.''

What matters is that fans will be able to experience all the music 
for themselves, the way music was meant to be heard.

``People analyze it to death,'' says Krys. ``But I think the truth is 
just in the music. You don't need to know anything more than that.''

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to