[5 articles]

Review: 'Baader Meinhof Complex' a true epic

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/04/MVNI199RNL.DTL&type=movies

Mick LaSalle, Chronicle Movie Critic
September 4, 2009

The Baader Meinhof Complex

Drama. Starring Martina Gedeck, Moritz Bleibtreu, Johanna Wokalek and 
Bruno Ganz. Directed by Uli Edel. In German with English subtitles. 
(R. 150 minutes. At the Embarcadero Center Cinema, Shattuck Cinema, 
Aquarius Theatre and Nickelodeon Theater.)

For a thoroughly fascinating, true glimpse into the horrors that 
vanity and self-delusion can wreak, take some time to see "The Baader 
Meinhof Complex."

The film is a deluxe German production - 150 minutes - meticulously 
directed by Uli Edel ("Last Exit to Brooklyn"), written by Bernd 
Eichinger ("Downfall") and starring some of Germany's best actors: 
Martina Gedeck, Moritz Bleibtreu, Johanna Wokalek and Bruno Ganz. 
These estimable talents come together to tell the story of the Red 
Army Faction, a German terrorist group that formed in the late '60s 
and dominated headlines in the 1970s.

The filmmakers adopt the wise strategy of never imposing their 
judgments on the viewer. Instead, working off of transcripts and 
real-life accounts, they simply re-create the Red Army Factions 
exploits, in accordance with the historical record. Ultimately, the 
film emerges as an exegesis of a certain mentality, alive and well in 
the 1970s, as well as a cautionary tale about the dangers of 
groupthink. People who easily might have gone through life peaceful 
end up committing atrocities against their fellow citizens - while 
deluding themselves that they're on the side of right.

"The Baader Meinhof Complex" contains four remarkable performances. 
The most chilling in its strange elusiveness and truth is that of 
Gedeck, who plays Ulrike Meinhof. Here was a married woman with 
children, who had a good job as a journalist and left-wing columnist. 
And then one day she chucked everything and picked up a machine gun. 
Gedeck ("The Lives of Others," "Mostly Martha"), an actress very good 
at suggesting something weak or skewed beneath a smooth facade, 
brings that quality to Meinhof.

Bleibtreu has the role of Andreas Baader, playing him as a kind of 
charismatic thug, who can spout Marxist ideology to serve his every 
selfish end. In a less flashy role, Ganz ("Downfall") makes an 
equally strong impression, bringing wiliness and introspection to the 
role of Horst Herold, the head of the German police force. Herold 
realizes that to catch terrorists he needs to think like one, to 
understand their motivations and goals - or, as he puts it, to 
understand the "myth" that they live with.

And no one is more deeply immersed in the whole myth than Gudrun 
Ensslin, Baader's girlfriend and partner in crime. As played by 
Wokalek, Gudrun never doubts her own virtue or judgment. Rather, 
Wokalek plays her as the kind of person who could burn other people 
to death and yet think of herself as a modern Joan of Arc. We might 
see Lady Macbeth. She sees herself as an underdog beset by the 
faithless, and as a visionary with the courage to see the obvious 
that others would deny. Along the way, Wokalek gives audiences 
something valuable, a portrait of murderous evil that is, at once, 
perfectly human and understandable.

How could anybody think that firebombing a department store in West 
Germany could be justified as a protest against - get ready - 
America's involvement in Vietnam? This is the madness portrayed in 
"The Baader Meinhof Complex," a rare epic that deserves every minute 
of its epic length. Director Uli Edel has a feel for the era's 
internal and external life, for both its mentality and for the ways 
in which violence played out on the street.

-- Advisory: This film contains full frontal nudity, strong language 
(in subtitle) and extreme violence.
--

E-mail Mick LaSalle at [email protected].

--------

[See URL for embedded links.]

The Politics of Cool:
        The Baader Meinhof Complex

http://sfappeal.com/culture/2009/09/the-politics-of-cool-the-baader-meinhof-complex.php

There's so much going on in the Baader Meinhof Complex it could fill 
a book. In fact, it was a book. This book.

So here's the deal. In the late 60s in Germany, there was a group who 
called themselves the RAF (Red Army Faction), who others came to call 
the Baader-Meinhof Gang (two of their leaders were named Baader and 
Meinhof, you see). They were militant communists who organized a 
series of terrorist attacks in protest of all kinds of things they 
dubbed "fascist". (Although it mostly lurks in the background, it's 
important to remember these are very much post-Holocaust times). They 
weren't particularly discriminate, and their actions were mostly 
deplored, but there was an undercurrent of sympathy that ordinary 
civilians showed for them. This movie takes that sympathy, defends 
it, condemns it, justifies it, ridicules it, tries to put it in 
context with the sexual revolution, and eventually hangs it out to dry.

How does one do this, you ask? With two and a half-hours, some rock 
music, a Palestinian terrorist training camp, naked women on 
rooftops, a portrait of Mao Zedong, a copy of Moby Dick, and a 
leather jacket. The movie jumps from anarchy-tinged anger to big-band 
rallies, from three people in an apartment to five people in a 
different apartment. The attacks escalate from planting bombs in 
police stations to the hijacking of a Lufthansa jet. Every action 
seems equal parts mercilessness, conviction, and vanity. And that's 
the complex. Baader had it. Meinhof had it. The question is, did 
everyone else have it too? And there's the inevitable, do we as 
audience members still have it?

It's not so much a movie about the late 60s as it is a movie about 
looking back at the late 60s. In one scene, Andreas Baader gets out 
of jail to come home and find his girlfriend in the tub with a young 
boy who just escaped a juvenile detention center. He says a few 
words, kisses her, grabs her breast, and as he's walking out, the boy 
says to him, "Cool jacket." Baader takes off the jacket and throws it 
to him, effectively handing off his own cool to the next generation. 
A couple scenes later when we see Andreas Baader again, he's wearing 
a different, equally cool, leather jacket. This reminds us that for 
all the political idealism, for all the fighting for the little guy, 
and for all the solidarity, these guys really wanted to be rock 
stars. As a result, it's as similar to Almost Famous as The Battle of 
Algiers. But what do I know? I wasn't there.

The movie is epic, culminating in a entire final chapter of courtroom 
drama and prison politicking. It's very much an Academy Awards movie 
and it was nominated last year for Best Foreign Language Film. Having 
already released in Europe, it drew some mixed responses. People 
sympathetic to the RAF condemned it for making them look reckless and 
out of control. People who despise the RAF were angry that a viewer 
could sympathize with them. With politically-based movies, pissing 
off both sides is a sure sign of success for me.

As a perfect match for its, well, complex, political maneuvering, it 
has some confounding technique as well. There's a discombobulating 
mix of big and small. Each bomb that goes off feels suffocated by the 
camera. Each woman's bare breasts feel a little too up-front. We 
sympathize with the leaders, but when the focus turns to the 
followers, they're just blank faces. And when they somehow steal a 
jet, why doesn't it feel like they just stole a jet? The hectic style 
is consistent perhaps with the conflicted motives of the gang, but 
makes it tough for the viewer to keep up.

And ultimately I think it's about the viewer here. How do we fit into 
all this? How do we want our terrorists to act? Do we want to hate 
them like we love them? Or is the most hated person the one who's 
ignored? (I feel like Carrie Bradshaw if she wrote for the Washington 
Post.) The movie speculates but doesn't argue. Movies about the past 
shouldn't be just about the past. The Baader Meinhof Complex, finally 
coming to the U.S., surely isn't.

--------

The Baader Meinhof Complex

http://www.sfstation.com/the-baader-meinhof-complex-a21221

Engrossing Political-Historical Drama

By Mel Valentin
Sep 04, 2009

Directed and adapted by Uli Edel (Ring of the Nibelungs, Julius 
Caesar, "The Mists of Avalon") from Stefan Aust's best-selling 
non-fiction book, The Baader Meinhof Complex ("Der Baader Meinhof 
Komplex"), explores Germany's most notorious domestic group 
officially known as the Red Army Faction (RAF) and unofficially known 
as the "Baader-Meinhof Gang" as well as its two most prominent 
members, Ulrike Meinhof, a left-wing journalist turned chief 
propagandist and strategist for the RAF, and Andreas Baader, the 
nominal leader of the RAF from its founding in the late 60s through 
his death in the mid-70s. Engrossing, fascinating, and compelling, 
The Baader Meinhof Complex offers a clear-eyed, unromantic look at 
the pitfalls of how rigid, dogmatic ideology becomes the 
justification for political violence and not just political action.

The Baader Meinhof Complex opens in the late 1960s as student unrest 
and mass protests threaten to destabilize the West German government 
-- fueled by anti-Vietnam fervor, left wing, social justice-oriented 
political beliefs, a repressive, heavy-handed government, and the 
anti-authoritarian attitudes of the counter-cultural revolution that 
swept through Western countries during that period. Meinhof (Martina 
Gedeck), a left wing intellectual and journalist, initially refrains 
from active political participation. It's not until she discovers her 
husband having an affair that she leaves a comfortable middle-class 
existence (with her twin daughters in tow, however) for the RAF 
thanks to her friendship with Gudrun Ensslin (Johanna Wokalek), 
Baader's (Moritz Bleibtreu) girlfriend and RAF co-leader.

Formed in response to the violent government crackdown on student 
protests and the absence of left-wing voices in the West German 
parliament, the RAF under Baader, Ensslin and Meinhof bomb civilian, 
government, and U.S. military installations, rob banks (rationalized 
as "expropriation to finance the revolution"), after receiving 
training in the Middle East from Palestinian terrorists, and later, 
as student unrest and demonstrations dissipate, to kidnappings and 
assassinations to remain politically relevant.

Meinhof doesn't become an active member in the RAF's operations until 
the police capture Baader. Even then, Meinhof limits herself to chief 
propagandist and occasional strategist for the RAF. It's Baader and 
Ensslin, however, who plan and execute most of the RAF's actions. 
After they're captured, detained (for three years), and put on trial, 
the RAF's "second generation" carries on in their name.

While, by necessity and, presumably, historical precedent, The Baader 
Meinhof Complex focuses primarily on Baader, Meinhof, and Ensslin, 
other members of the RAF also receive screen time. Unfortunately, 
that's exactly where The Baader Meinhof Complex suffers the most: in 
delineating the supporting or background characters, some of whom 
appear in a handful of scenes, barely introduced, only to disappear 
altogether. Once The Baader Meinhof Complex shifts from Baader, 
Meinhof, and Ensslin, the RAF's second generation increases in 
importance, but given their late, sketchy introduction, it's 
difficult to follow them with anything except marginal, tangential interest.

The Baader Meinhof Complex's other major flaw lies in the absence of 
markers to denote the passage of time. While Edel includes the 
occasional montage to cross off major events (e.g., the political 
assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy), Edel 
doesn't include references to the year through title cards, 
superimposed text, or dialogue. Baader, Meinhof, and Ensslin's 
detention and trial last three years, but Edel discloses that in a 
single line of dialogue near the end of the film. It might sound like 
a minor point, but in a film tied so closely to historical events, 
it's important to let the audience in on when events are happening 
and the time between major events.

Where Edel succeeds, however, is in the portrayal of the RAF, the 
initial idealism of its chief members, and their relatively rapid 
descent from political activism to terrorism, including the murders 
of government officials, industrialists, and members of the police. 
Idealism fueled by ideology hardens into dogmatism, dogmatism hardens 
into an "Us-Them" mentality (an idea Ensslin mentions several times), 
and that "Us-Them" mentality allows Baader, Meinhof, Ensslin, and 
their followers to justify murder by dehumanizing political opponents.

Whatever its faults, The Baader Meinhof Complex is at, minimum, a 
cautionary tale, regardless of political ideology. Once political 
activism turns to violence, whatever value ideology may have (i.e., 
by reflecting real-world power relations) becomes, if not moot, then 
discredited.

--------

Baader to the bone

http://www.sfbg.com/entry.php?entry_id=9094&catid=110&volume_id=398&issue_id=447&volume_num=43&issue_num=49

Hipster terrorists? Uli Edel's new film exhaustively explores the Red 
Army Faction

BY KIMBERLY CHUN
September 2, 2009

"The Baader Meinhof gang? Those spoiled, hipster terrorists?" That 
was the response of one knowledgeable pop watcher when I told her 
about The Baader Mienhof Complex, the new feature from Uli Edel 
(1989's Last Exit to Brooklyn). The violence-prone West German 
anarchist group, otherwise known as the Red Army Faction (RAF), still 
inspires both venomous spew and starry-eyed fascination (see Joe 
Strummer's RAF T-shirt, Gerhard Richter's paintings of its dead 
leaders, and Erin Cosgrove's 2003 satirical romance paperback, The 
Baader-Meinhof Affair). Edel's sober, clear-eyed view of the youthful 
and sexy yet arrogant and murderous, gun-toting radicals at the 
center of Baader-Meinhof's mythology ­ a complex construct, indeed ­ 
manages to do justice to the core of their sprawling chronology, 
while never overstating their narrative's obvious post-9/11 relevance.

Based on the nonfiction best-seller by onetime Der Spiegel editor 
Stefan Aust, The Baader Meinhof Complex finds its still, watchful 
center in Ulrike Meinhof (Martina Gedeck).

Aust's onetime fourth-estate colleague makes the dramatic trajectory 
from bourgeois wife and mother to underground radical crawling 
through Mideast dust and toting a machine gun under the tutelage of 
Fatah. She's shocked by brutal police crackdowns on the student 
protests against the visiting shah of Iran and America's Vietnam War 
­ enacted with a cruelty reminiscent of the one-generation-removed SS 
and a reminder of a not-so-distant fascist past ­ and somewhat in awe 
of Andreas Baader (Moritz Bleibtreu) and Gudrun Ensslin (Johanna 
Wokalek), who emit rock-star charisma.

Helping to bust Baader out of jail on the pretext of working on a 
book, Meinhof joins her crushes in life on the lam. The three and 
their followers declare an urban guerrilla war on West Germany until 
they are nabbed and stuck in solitary at Stammheim Prison. While 
their trial descends into bitter, kangaroo court-style comedy, the 
RAF members outside resort to heightened feats of bloodshed and 
desperation in the so-called "German Autumn" of 1977, killing the 
chief federal prosecutor, kidnapping a banker, and finally conspiring 
in the hijacking of a Lufthansa jet.

Edel has absorbed his share of criticism for his RAF portrayal: the 
director's far from sympathetic when it comes to these self-absorbed, 
smug rebels, who relish offending their Muslim hosts by sunbathing 
nude, yet he's not immune to their cocky, idealistic charms. 
Cool-headed yet fully capable of thrilling to his subjects' 
eye-popping audacity, the filmmaker does an admirable job of 
contextualizing the group within the global student and activist 
movements and bringing the viewer, authentically, to the still timely 
question: how does one best (i.e., morally) respond to terrorism?

--------

Scars of German terrorism survive

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-baader-meinhof4-2009sep04,0,5871981.story

Depiction of terrorists prompts some of the victims' loved ones to 
decry the film, which opens in the U.S.

By Kate Connolly
September 4, 2009

Reporting from Berlin - When "The Baader Meinhof Complex," an epic 
depiction of left-wing terrorists who cut a murderous and explosive 
path through German politics in the 1970s, debuted here last fall, it 
was like taking a knife to a partially healed wound.

The film, which opened in limited release in the U.S. last week, did 
solid business at home, won critical plaudits and was nominated for 
an Academy Award in the foreign film competition.

But "Baader Meinhof" also ignited fierce debate over whether the film 
glorifies the terrorist Red Army Faction -- responsible for 34 deaths 
and numerous kidnappings and bombings -- or gives an unsparing 
portrayal of the gang's brutality. And not all of the reactions have 
fallen along predictable lines.

The 2-hour, 24 minute-film chronicles the rise and fall of the RAF, 
principally focusing on its leaders Ulrike Meinhof, Andreas Baader 
and Gudrun Ensslin. Director Uli Edel and writer-producer Bernd 
Eichinger have punctuated the movie with action sequences but also 
provide political context. The terrorists saw their violence, in 
part, as a struggle against a previous generation they perceived to 
have been implicit in -- and to have subsequently failed to confront 
-- the country's Nazi past.

Among the most vocal critics of the portrayal is the daughter of 
Meinhof, Bettina Röhl, who was abandoned by her mother, who left to 
join the RAF.

"Society has not managed to overcome this trauma until now precisely 
because of such unscrupulous people who insisted on keeping the RAF 
on the boil for their own means," Röhl wrote in a blog in response to 
the movie. She added that the movie did nothing to "bury the RAF 
corpse" as she felt should have happened long ago, but "embalms it instead."

Michael Buback, son of one of the gang's murder victims, said the 
film pays little heed to the victims or their survivors. "We feel 
we're playing the victims all over again," he said.

But that feeling was not universal.

Jorg Schleyer, son of industrialist Hanns-Martin Schleyer, who was 
kidnapped and killed by the RAF in 1977, described the movie as a 
frank portrayal of the gang as a "wantonly brutal band of murderers . 
. . without damaging the memory of the victims."

Frank Schirrmacher, editor of the highly regarded Frankfurter 
Allgemeine Zeitung, praised the film for finally "doing away with the 
histrionic fustiness" surrounding the RAF, which for 30 years, he 
said, had allowed "left-wing romantic filmmakers and RAF 
sympathizers" to nurture the idea of home-grown "feel-good terrorism" 
in Germany.

But Petra Terhoeven, a historian at the University of Göttingen, was 
critical of the film's failure to mention Meinhof's "statement of 
support" of the massacre of Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics 
in 1972 by Palestinian terroristsand what Terhoeven described as the 
gang's manipulation of "the dark German past" into a 
"self-victimization" PR strategy.

What was clear was that even though Meinhof, Baader and Ensslin are 
dead and their crimes extend three decades into the past, the events 
are still potent in German society.

And as if to underline this, just last week another member of the 
gang who had served her sentence was arrested in connection with the 
1977 murder of chief federal prosecutor Siegfried Buback at the hands 
of the RAF, which is graphically depicted in the film. The woman 
allegedly had been linked to the envelopes containing the group's 
claims of responsibility for the killing.

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to