The Denial of My Parole

I Am Barack Obama's Political Prisoner Now

http://counterpunch.org/peltier09112009.html

By LEONARD PELTIER
September 11-13, 2009

The United States Department of Justice has once again made a mockery 
of its lofty and pretentious title.

After releasing an original and continuing disciple of death cult 
leader Charles Manson who attempted to shoot President Gerald Ford, 
an admitted Croatian terrorist, and another attempted assassin of 
President Ford under the mandatory 30-year parole law, the U.S. 
Parole Commission deemed that my release would "promote disrespect 
for the law."

If only the federal government would have respected its own laws, not 
to mention the treaties that are, under the U.S. Constitution, the 
supreme law of the land, I would never have been convicted nor forced 
to spend more than half my life in captivity. Not to mention the fact 
that every law in this country was created without the consent of 
Native peoples and is applied unequally at our expense. If nothing 
else, my experience should raise serious questions about the FBI's 
supposed jurisdiction in Indian Country.

The parole commission's phrase was lifted from soon-to-be former U.S. 
Attorney Drew Wrigley, who apparently hopes to ride with the FBI 
cavalry into the office of North Dakota governor. In this Wrigley is 
following in the footsteps of William Janklow, who built his 
political career on his reputation as an Indian fighter, moving on up 
from tribal attorney (and alleged rapist of a Native minor) to state 
attorney general, South Dakota governor, and U.S. Congressman. Some 
might recall that Janklow claimed responsibility for dissuading 
President Clinton from pardoning me before he was convicted of 
manslaughter. Janklow's historical predecessor, George Armstrong 
Custer, similarly hoped that a glorious massacre of the Sioux would 
propel him to the White House, and we all know what happened to him.

Unlike the barbarians that bay for my blood in the corridors of 
power, however, Native people are true humanitarians who pray for our 
enemies. Yet we must be realistic enough to organize for our own 
freedom and equality as nations. We constitute 5% of the population 
of North Dakota and 10% of South Dakota and we could utilize that 
influence to promote our own power on the reservations, where our 
focus should be. If we organized as a voting bloc, we could defeat 
the entire premise of the competition between the Dakotas as to which 
is the most racist. In the 1970s we were forced to take up arms to 
affirm our right to survival and self-defense, but today the war is 
one of ideas. We must now stand up to armed oppression and 
colonization with our bodies and our minds. International law is on our side.

Given the complexion of the three recent federal parolees, it might 
seem that my greatest crime was being Indian. But the truth is that 
my gravest offense is my innocence. In Iran, political prisoners are 
occasionally released if they confess to the ridiculous charges on 
which they are dragged into court, in order to discredit and 
intimidate them and other like-minded citizens. The FBI and its 
mouthpieces have suggested the same, as did the parole commission in 
1993, when it ruled that my refusal to confess was grounds for denial 
of parole.

To claim innocence is to suggest that the government is wrong, if not 
guilty itself. The American judicial system is set up so that the 
defendant is not punished for the crime itself, but for refusing to 
accept whatever plea arrangement is offered and for daring to compel 
the judicial system to grant the accused the right to right to rebut 
the charges leveled by the state in an actual trial. Such insolence 
is punished invariably with prosecution requests for the steepest 
possible sentence, if not an upward departure from sentencing 
guidelines that are being gradually discarded, along with the 
possibility of parole.

As much as non-Natives might hate Indians, we are all in the same 
boat. To attempt to emulate this system in tribal government is 
pitiful, to say the least.

It was only this year, in the Troy Davis, case, that the U.S. Supreme 
Court recognized innocence as a legitimate legal defense. Like the 
witnesses that were coerced into testifying against me, those that 
testified against Davis renounced their statements, yet Davis was 
very nearly put to death. I might have been executed myself by now, 
had not the government of Canada required a waiver of the death 
penalty as a condition of extradition.

The old order is aptly represented by Supreme Court Justice Antonin 
Scalia, who stated in his dissenting opinion in the Davis case, "This 
Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a 
convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later 
able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent. Quite 
to the contrary, we have repeatedly left that question unresolved, 
while expressing considerable doubt that any claim based on alleged 
'actual innocence' is constitutionally cognizable."

The esteemed Senator from North Dakota, Byron Dorgan, who is now the 
chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, used much the 
same reasoning in writing that "our legal system has found Leonard 
Peltier guilty of the crime for which he was charged. I have reviewed 
the material from the trial, and I believe the verdict was fair and just."

It is a bizarre and incomprehensible statement to Natives, as well it 
should be, that innocence and guilt is a mere legal status, not 
necessarily rooted in material fact. It is a truism that all 
political prisoners were convicted of the crimes for which they were charged.

The truth is the government wants me to falsely confess in order to 
validate a rather sloppy frame-up operation, one whose exposure would 
open the door to an investigation of the United States' role in 
training and equipping goon squads to suppress a grassroots movement 
on Pine Ridge against a puppet dictatorship.

In America, there can by definition be no political prisoners, only 
those duly judged guilty in a court of law. It is deemed too 
controversial to even publicly contemplate that the federal 
government might fabricate and suppress evidence to defeat those 
deemed political enemies. But it is a demonstrable fact at every 
stage of my case.

I am Barack Obama's political prisoner now, and I hope and pray that 
he will adhere to the ideals that impelled him to run for president. 
But as Obama himself would acknowledge, if we are expecting him to 
solve our problems, we missed the point of his campaign. Only by 
organizing in our own communities and pressuring our supposed leaders 
can we bring about the changes that we all so desperately need. 
Please support the Leonard Peltier Defense Offense Committee in our 
effort to hold the United States government to its own words.

I thank you all who have stood by me all these years, but to name 
anyone would be to exclude many more. We must never lose hope in our 
struggle for freedom.

In the Spirit of Crazy Horse,

Leonard Peltier
Leonard Peltier #89637-132
USP-Lewisburg
US Penitentiary
PO Box 1000
Lewisburg, PA 17837

For more information on Leonard Peltier visit the Leonard Peltier 
Defense-Offense Committee website.
http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/

.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to