[2 articles]

First Person:
        Remembering the Free Speech Movement On its 45th Anniversary

http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2009-12-03/article/34204?headline=First-Person-Remembering-the-Free-Speech-Movement-On-its-45th-Anniversary

By Raymond Barglow
Thursday December 03, 2009

I walked onto the UC Berkeley campus today, Wednesday, to attend the noon rally, in commemoration of the Free Speech Movement. On this day 45 years ago, I also came to the campus, and got arrested along with 800 others because of our occupation of Sproul Hall. This was the day that Mario Savio gave his famous speech from the steps of Sproul: "There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part ..."

So I was thinking about Mario and wishing he were walking alongside me this morning. I knew him only as a fellow student in the Cal philosophy department, not as a friend. We took several courses together and would talk sometimes about philosophical matters: Is the mind identical to the body? Can ethical value judgments be rationally justified? One of the philosophers whom Mario admired was Immanuel Kant, whose ethics enjoins us to always respect others as ends in themselves, never merely as a means to the satisfaction of our own interests.

In his recent biography of Savio, Robert Cohen writes that Mario and the FSM "embodied a mass movement rooted in moral principle rather than in political calculation or opportunism, standing up for freedom despite the odds of succeeding against a powerful university administration." That sounds right to me. And although I'm mostly an observer these days, no longer an active participant in campus protest activities, I recognize in talking with this generation's activists a similar moral impulse. "No cuts, no fees; education should be free!" they chant. At issue today is whether everyone has the right to an education. Forty-five years ago, the issue was students' rights to organize on campus on behalf of the civil rights and anti-war movements.

The Free Speech Movement didn't win all of its demands, but we made substantial progress. Students and workers on campus are now permitted by the UC administration to organize support for political causes. Can today's campus community win its demands? Can we throw open the gates to a college education to every qualified high school graduate who wishes to enter them?

The social forces that we face today tell us that money for higher education simply is not there. We're up against not only a self-serving Board of Regents and Governor, and overpaid administrators reluctant to bite the hand that feeds them, but also against a federal government that starves public schools at the same time that it provides a banquet to the weapons manufacturers. And now the President aims to escalate the war in Afghanistan, costing many more hundreds of billions of dollars and many lives.

Forty-five years ago was, it seems to me, a more hopeful time in our nation's history. Can today's protest movement on college campuses up and down the state keep hope alive? I don't know. But I'm encouraged when I perceive the Kantian community-mindedness that links the generations. My guess is that Mario would have appreciated that too.

-------

It's 1964 No More

http://www.dailycal.org/article/107746/it_s_1964_no_more

Campus Issues: On the anniversary of the Free Speech Movement, it's time for the campus to create a new legacy of productive protest.

By Senior Editorial Board
Daily Cal Staff Writer
Friday, December 4, 2009

Forty-five years ago this week, Mario Savio made an impassioned cry for awareness and freedom of expression that awoke a powerful movement on this campus. Today, references and comparisons to the Free Speech Movement are inescapable. But in the midst of another struggle on this campus to challenge the status quo, are Savio's words still relevant?

The struggle, this time around, is vastly different. Protesters are attempting to tackle a complex problem which affects not only this campus, but institutions of public higher education throughout the state. And the root of this problem--money-has left our educational futures inextricably tied to the preferences of Californians and their elected representatives, who may or may not believe they have a real stake in the university's success. Not to mention the serious structural shortcomings that hamper our state's adequate functioning-over which no one on this campus has contro-like Proposition 13, the supermajority requirement and the ballot initiative system.

For the current activists to be successful, it's critical that they understand these differences. We shouldn't be discouraged, however, from aspiring to Savio's ideals. As the awareness of our student body shows, the Free Speech Movement gave us a living legacy of student activism. UC Berkeley students strive to question and challenge the status quo, and the current protests have continued this legacy, for better or worse.

Campus activists against fee hikes lack a clear strategy, unified membership and a specific goal. But that spirit, which motivated Savio in speaking those words, has continued on this campus, and if it's channeled properly, we're hopeful about the prospects for change.

What's clear is that the old methods-like sit-ins and building occupations-aren't sufficient to bring about the change that's needed. Until now, the protests have successfully drawn attention to the campus, but the actions must evolve if we want to find a real solution.

We don't know where the protests are going. If we continue to have an open discussion about the future of public higher education, this could just be the start of something new and something momentous. Maybe this can be the start of changing the structure of higher education through a new way of protest, the creation of a new legacy for UC Berkeley to carry on.

.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en.


Reply via email to