anyone who thinks Eldridge Cleaver, David Horowitz and Sol Stern are 
reasonable, is open to some serious challenges as to his reasonableness, as 
well.
---- radtimes <[email protected]> wrote: 
> A monthly manifesto of American self-loathing
> 
> http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=de72e42a-91bc-4c8c-bde9-966b6e250409
> 
> Robert Fulford
> January 30, 2010
> 
> In the last years of the 1960s, it appeared that most American 
> university students, and quite a few of their Canadian 
> contemporaries, had suddenly converted to a passionate, angry 
> socialism. For leftists operating in democracies, this was a brief 
> but sweet moment in a mainly disappointing century.
> 
> The reason was the Vietnam War. It aroused such horror among young 
> people that their rage spilled over into every corner of public life. 
> Those who set out to campaign for peace were caught up in a tangle of 
> self-righteous leftish causes. Capitalism, liberal democracy and 
> universities were among the forces blamed for war. Among the 
> students, a New Left was born, celebrated itself, then slowly expired.
> 
> There are those who argue that we should forget the 1960s. But in 
> certain ways, it's with us still, the nightmare from which North 
> American politics has never quite escaped. It appears now in a milder 
> but persistent form; Naomi Klein, for example, plays like a 1960s rerun.
> 
> For several of those remarkable years, a San Francisco-based 
> magazine, Ramparts, functioned as the most exuberant, effective, 
> foolish and hysterical expression of New Left feelings. It lasted 
> only 13 years and mattered for only about three, 1966 to 1968, but 
> its impact was unquestionable. The circulation reached 250,000, 
> spectacularly high for a publication of its type.
> 
> Peter Richardson, who was seven years old in 1966, now brings that 
> peculiar moment alive with his bright, evocative history, A Bomb in 
> Every Issue: How the Short, Unruly Life of Ramparts Magazine Changed America.
> 
> In 1967, a Ramparts article revealed that the CIA was secretly 
> funding liberal anti-communist organizations. Ramparts uncovered 
> sponsorship of the National Student Association; other journalists, 
> inspired by Ramparts, disclosed clandestine support of Encounter 
> magazine, the American Federation of Labor's international program, 
> and the Congress for Cultural Freedom, an organization led by 
> intellectuals such as Arthur Koestler and Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. 
> Gloria Steinem proved be a recipient of CIA funds, and so did Norman 
> Thomas, head of the Socialist Party of America. CBS broadcast a Mike 
> Wallace program, In the Pay of the CIA. Most of the people involved 
> said they'd believed the money came from independent foundations.
> 
> Ramparts made national celebrities out of the Black Panthers while 
> carefully refusing to notice that most of them were thugs who 
> considered Marxism a meal ticket. It published the best-known leftist 
> writers of the era, among them Susan Sontag, Jessica Mitford, Seymour 
> Hersh and Noam Chomsky. The most admired of several editors, Warren 
> Hinckle, never met a radical he didn't like. He published the diaries 
> of Che Guevara and an attack on American "barbarism" by Fidel Castro. 
> Anyone with a conspiracy theory, particularly if it involved John 
> Kennedy's assassination, was assured of a place in Ramparts. A cover 
> in the last years of Ramparts showed the burning of a Bank of America 
> branch in Southern California. The text that accompanied it said that 
> the radical students who set the fire "may have done more for saving 
> the environment than all the teach-ins put together."
> 
> For several of its principal creators, Ramparts ended in regrets. Two 
> major editors, Peter Collier and David Horowitz, turned against 
> everything it stood for and became much-published right-wing 
> journalists. A third senior editor, Sol Stern, became a conservative 
> critic of liberal education. Recently, in City Journal, he 
> acknowledged that Ramparts "changed America" -- but for the worse.
> 
> As a result of attacks against America like those in Ramparts, U.S. 
> liberals lost their nerve. They were left chagrined and repentant and 
> came to think American power could never be used for good. That 
> explains why liberal guilt still paralyzes America, inhibiting the 
> use of power when American power is needed, as it is increasingly in 
> the 21st century.
> 
> Ramparts campaigned for total withdrawal of all American troops, 
> Stern recalls, because "we wanted the communists to win and were sure 
> that they would." The editors thought the communists were Vietnam's 
> rightful rulers. A Ramparts cover showed Ho Chi Minh as George 
> Washington crossing the Delaware.
> 
> Eldridge Cleaver (1935-1998) perhaps moved farthest from the Ramparts 
> ideal. He was hired as a staff writer and celebrated as a charismatic 
> black radical in a cover story. Later, as a born-again Christian, he 
> briefly led a revivalist ministry. Then, under the brand name 
> Eldridge de Paris, he designed a line of men's clothing, featuring 
> pants with a codpiece, a "Cleaver Sleeve." He re-entered politics as 
> a conservative Republican and in 1980 and 1984 endorsed Ronald Reagan 
> for president.
> 
> Like many figures in this book, Cleaver learned to reject the toxic, 
> self-loathing creeds of the 1960s. Others, sadly -- including many 
> who were not yet born during that decade -- still insist on 
> celebrating a time of infinite self-delusion.
> --
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> .
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Sixties-L" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en.

Reply via email to