Problem of conservative reactionary ultra-left

http://www.theleafchronicle.com/article/20101212/COLUMNISTS106/12120304

December 12, 2010

In a society that has abolished every kind of adventure the only adventure that remains is to abolish the society. ­ Anarchist slogan, France 1968
--

I recently came upon an article informing me that the esteemed Berkeley, Calif., city council was debating whether to honor the Army private who may have given classified information to Wikileaks. I had to smile a little bit at that. Apparently, no one has paid attention to them for a while (not since they kicked out the Marine Recruiting station as "unwelcome intruders") prompting someone over there to think that it was time to do something really stupid controversial ­ something really stupid and controversial.

If you're a "Republican Conservative," try to resist tarring all liberals with that brush. Most of the Berkeley leftists are as far from the liberal mainstream as some of the wackier militias are from mainstream conservatism. Even among some of my very liberal friends and family, the pronouncements and excesses of the hard-core Berkeley contingent are not given much (if any) credence. And if you've ever spent any time in the area just outside the UC Berkeley campus, then you know that it is literally a living museum of Sixties counter-culture "culture," occupying a sort of misfit island even in the very liberal/progressive Bay Area.

I think we have hit the point where you can almost say that the denizens of Berkeley constitute a sort of ultra-conservative reactionary wing of the left (strange as that may sound), being apparently unable to let go of the past and move on from the Sixties. That includes the twenty-somethings who mourn having missed "The Movement," despising the stultifying boredom of a society that is removing all adventure except for that found in video games.

In a way, I can understand the attraction for a lot of people. The old guard of the Sixties loves to reminisce about battles with cops back when you could seriously get your head broken on national TV, even in places like Berkeley. Back then, it took some courage to stand up to "the Establishment." No matter if you think that much of it was wrong-headed, engaging in violent protest imparted a similar sort of bonding experience for the children of privilege that the poor and lower middle-class were experiencing ­ on a much more intense level - in Vietnam.

And then something happened. In many parts of the country, the "counter-culture" became the establishment.

And then something else happened; many of the former free-love "turn on, tune-in, drop out" generation turned magically into no-fun and unceasingly moralistic busy-bodies who attempted to place a sort of condom of rules, regulations, and restrictions over the entire country, doing so (as C.S. Lewis put it) with the happy approval of their own consciences. If there is a source for the incoherency of many on the left, it may be that they have yet to come to grips with the juxtaposition of the nostalgic desire for untrammeled freedom and the concurrent impulse to trammel the h-ll out of every last vestige of freedom, all in the cause of making sure everyone plays nice and is never, ever offended by anything.

Those are two things that are hard to square within any rational framework. For those who hang on to the Sixties and the anarchist mindset like a sacred talisman, while simultaneously being pushed politically to a point where they have to defend the soft tyranny of smiley-face fascism, rationality is simply too much of a burden to be carried any further.

And so we get the preening posers on the Berkeley city council celebrating the exploits of Wikileaks, even as they do enormous damage to the current administration.

Standard-issue liberals take note; they don't seem to care that we have a Democratic administration in the White House. As far as Berkeley and Wikileaks are concerned, the far-right starts with President Obama and just goes further right from there.

.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en.

Reply via email to