'You Say You Want a Revolution'

Recent events in Egypt, Tunisia, and other Islamic countries in North
Africa and Southwest Asia have gotten me thinking again about the 1960s
and also about organizing a secondary school social studies unit around
the idea of revolution in the twentieth century. The title of this post
is from a song by John Lennon and The Beatles where they declared that
they would not blindly support calls to overturn society and replace it
with something they found equally or even more repressive. On the other
hand, Bob Marley, father of Jamaican Reggae, called on the disposed of
the world to stand up for their rights and Bob Dylan heralded times that
were changing and demanded that people either join the movement for
social change or get out of the way, much as young people are doing in
Egypt.

The 1960s were a time of revolutionary upheaval around the world,
especially 1968 when young people, including me, marched in the streets
and defiantly challenged governmental authority in Mexico City, Cairo,
Warsaw, Buenos Aires, Madrid, Paris, Berlin, Prague, Rome, London,
Tokyo, Kingston (Jamaica), New York, and Chicago. We demanded, as did
revolutionary movements before and after us, fundamental change in the
organization of society and the legal system (justice), opening up the
decision-making process to people previously excluded from participation
(democracy), the extension of social, political, and economic rights to
the dispossessed (liberty), and the elimination of what we considered
arbitrary restrictions on personal behavior (freedom). We hoped to
achieve these goals through collective struggle and were willing to
break laws and put our lives and privileges at risk.

There is still dispute amongst historians, educators and government
policy makers about why protest exploded around the globe during the
1960s. Explanations include cultural and generational conflicts, sexual
liberation and drug use, the changing role of women and the nature of
work, extended education and financial dependence, as well as the impact
of class and anti-imperialist struggles.

The thing that is striking about the political 60s for me is that these
movements that seemed so earthshaking at the time, an American President
decided not to run for reelection, passed from the historical scene
without creating new types of governments and societies. Part of the
problem was that upheaval that does not generate new social and
political institutions has a tendency to die out, either due to
repression, frustration, or cultural absorption into the mainstream. I
worry that the Middle Eastern movements will suffer a similar fate and
that "old regimes" will return to power unless new democratic
institutions are quickly put into place.

A number of important historical themes and essential questions can be
examined in a thematic and comparative unit on revolutionary movements
in the 20th century. Students will discover that foreign imperialist
powers and domestic dictators rarely give up their power without costly
and destructive wars and often underestimated the ability and popular
appeal of revolutionary leaders such as Patrice Lumumba of the Congo and
Ho Chi Minh of Vietnam and Revolutionary wars, whether against foreign
occupiers or local oppressors, tend to be violent affairs that employ
intimidation and attacks on civilians. Generally, all sides employ
terror tactics. This raises the question of whether, or when, ends
justify means.

A comparative examination of revolutionary wars shows that they tend to
have their own historical logic. Many were initially led by small groups
of committed individuals with liberationist goals, developed broad
popular support, sometimes suddenly as in Ireland after World War I and
in Cuba in 1958, and sometimes over an extended period of time, had
difficulty establishing democratic institutions after achieving power,
and then deteriorated into dictatorships responsible for human rights
abuses. Success in battle by revolutionary leaders did not always
translate into success in building a just and democratic society.
T-shirts with the image of Ernesto "Ché" Guevara are much more popular
than t-shirts celebrating Fidel Castro, in fact, I have never seen one,
even when I visited Cuba.

Revolutionary wars, fought to liberate the economic potential of
societies, have often left countries impoverished and unable to improve
conditions for their citizens. Since the French Revolution of the late
18th century, the return of repressive government following a revolution
is termed the Thermidorian Reaction.

The idea of revolution can be romantic, exhilarating, and frightening
depending on your social position and individual involvement. Two of
history's most famous romantic revolutionaries were the British poet
Lord George Gordon Byron (1788-1824) and the Argentine-born doctor
Ernesto "Ché" Guevara. Both died while involved in movements to liberate
other countries. In 1823, Byron joined insurgents against the Ottoman
Turkish occupation of Greece, but he succumbed to fever before seeing
any military action. Guevara, an Argentine, joined Fidel Castro and
other Cuban revolutionaries and played a major role in overthrowing the
Batista dictatorship and building a socialist society in the 1950s and
1960s. He left Cuba to support revolutionary movements in other
countries and was assassinated by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency
in Bolivia in 1968.

But not all revolutionaries and revolutions are remembered with the
fondness of Byron and Guevara. The French Revolution transformed French
and European society, but lead to periods of "terror," reaction, and
dictatorship under Napoleon. Historians have debated whether all
revolutions are doomed to follow this pattern. The Haitian Revolution of
1793-1804, the most successful slave rebellion in human history, had a
horrendous level of violence against both life and property and an
independent Haiti has been mired in poverty since. Similar problems
emerged in the struggles for Congolese, Kenyan, and Algerian
independence. All of these revolutionary movements confronted savage
repression by occupying forces. Students need to consider who are the
real terrorists and must societies be cleansed after these
conflagrations?

I have posted activity sheets for teaching about revolutionary movements
in the twentieth century on my website in the drop-down Teaching Global
History.

--
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-singer/you-say-you-want-a-revolu_1_b_824194.html
Via InstaFetch

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en.

Reply via email to