Former Black Panther Leader, Geronimo Ji-Jaga Pratt, Wrongfully Imprisoned for 
27 Years, Dies in Tanzania

                                democracynow.org | Oct 5th 2000                 
                                                                                
                                                                 

We look at the life of former Black Panther, Geronimo ji-Jaga Pratt, who died 
in Tanzania on Thursday. In 1972, Pratt was wrongfully convicted of the murder 
of Caroline Olsen for which he spent 27 years in prison, eight of those in 
solitary confinement. He was released in 1997 after a judge vacated his 
conviction. The trial to win his freedom revealed that the Los Angeles Black 
Panther leader was a target of the FBI’s counterintelligence program, or 
COINTELPRO. We play an excerpt of a Democracy Now! interview with Pratt and one 
of his attorneys, Johnnie Cochran, Jr., in 2000. We also speak with his friend 
and former attorney, Stuart Hanlon, and with Ed Boyer, the Los Angeles Times 
reporter who helped expose his innocence. "The FBI followed Geronimo every 
second, almost, of his life, and they knew he was in Oakland at the time of the 
homicide," says Hanlon. "When we started litigating this, rather than turning 
it over, for the first time anyone could remember FBI wiretaps disappeared. And 
of course they knew where he was. It didn’t matter what the truth was, because 
he was the bad guy, and the truth had to take second place, even in the 
courtroom." Pratt ultimately won a $4.5 million civil rights settlement against 
the FBI and the Los Angeles Police Department. [includes rush transcript]

AMY GOODMAN: The former Black Panther leader Geronimo ji-Jaga Pratt died 
Thursday at the age of 63 in a village in the East African country of Tanzania.

In 1972, Pratt was wrongfully convicted of the murder of Caroline Olsen. He 
spent 27 years in prison, eight of those in solitary confinement. He was 
released in 1997 after a Reagan appointee, a judge, vacated his conviction. 
Geronimo ji-Jaga Pratt, his family and supporters always maintained he was 
targeted and framed by the FBI and the L.A. Police Department because of his 
activity in the Black Panther Party. Two years after his release, Pratt won a 
$4.5 million settlement of his civil rights case against the FBI and LAPD. The 
FBI’s share of $1.75 million marked one of the few times in its history it was 
forced to admit culpability in a case of false imprisonment.

Geronimo ji-Jaga Pratt, born Elmer Pratt, was a Louisiana native, decorated 
Vietnam vet who served in the Army’s 82nd Airborne.

Before we turn to our guests, I’d like to play part of a radio interview I did 
with Geronimo Pratt in 2000, three years after he was released from jail. We 
were also joined in WBAI’s studios in New York for this conversation by one of 
Geronimo ji-Jaga Pratt’s attorney’s, Johnnie Cochran, who died in 2005.

GERONIMO JI-JAGA PRATT: Well, I grew up in segregation, and we had to deal with 
the terror from the Klan violence and, you know, other forms of ignorance from 
those peoples. But growing up in that kind of environment instilled in me a 
pride of—or a sense of nationalism, that we can govern ourselves, and we can 
protect ourselves, and we didn’t need to be with anyone who didn’t want to be 
with us. So, out of that, I was part of a group that was selected by the elders 
to get military training, to come back to the community, you know, and help 
protect it, relieve the old soldiers. It just so happened that when I was 
selected, Vietnam was happening, and I ended up in Vietnam and survived that, 
two tours, or two and a half. And when I came back, it was shortly after Martin 
Luther King was assassinated, so the black nation was more or less at one now 
with the—just being fed up. And everyone was saying, "Look, we have to do 
something." So us young militant types were employed quite extensively 
throughout the nation. And so, this is how I ended up in these cities 
contributing what little I could contribute.

AMY GOODMAN: And you got involved then with the Black Panther Party?

GERONIMO JI-JAGA PRATT: Well, with various organizations, including the Black 
Panther Party.

AMY GOODMAN: So, how did you end up in a courtroom being tried for the murder 
of Caroline Olsen? She was killed playing on a Santa Monica tennis court with 
her husband in 1968. You were caught and charged when?

GERONIMO JI-JAGA PRATT: Well, I was arrested two years after that, in 1970, in 
Dallas, Texas, where I was instrumental in helping to organize the first Black 
Panther chapter there in Dallas, Texas, and other parts of the South. I was 
charged because of a conspiracy by the government that was led by the 
Hoover—what we call the Hoover-Nixon regime, which was an illegal conspiracy 
directed against the entire left, entire movement.

AMY GOODMAN: Johnnie Cochran, how did you get involved with Geronimo’s case?

JOHNNIE COCHRAN, JR.: I was appointed by the court, by Judge Kathleen Parker, 
to represent Mr. Pratt in the murder case. I had met him and had sat alongside 
him in another case, the so-called Panther shootout case that took place in 
1970, ’71, in L.A., was then the longest trial ever. And all the Panthers were 
pretty much acquitted of all the charges in that, and it was a bogus case. The 
court then appointed me to represent him in the tennis court murder case.

AMY GOODMAN: And what happened in that first trial?

JOHNNIE COCHRAN, JR.: Well, it was an amazing trial. I mean, we came in there 
knowing and believing strongly that Geronimo Pratt was innocent. We sought to 
set out to prove that innocence, to establish an alibi. We ran into some 
problems in getting other Panther members to come and establish the alibi. Mr. 
Pratt was in Oakland at the time of these killings in December of 1968. None of 
the other—none of the Panthers who were affiliated with or aligned with Huey 
Newton would come. So, Kathleen Cleaver was in exile—

JUAN GONZALEZ: And that was because he had already been expelled from the 
Panther party.

JOHNNIE COCHRAN, JR.: Mr. Pratt had been expelled, and further, that the FBI 
had infiltrated so much that they had inculcated this kind fear and distress 
and whatever. They wouldn’t let him come testify. So we got Kathleen Cleaver to 
come back, and she was a great witness. She couldn’t pin it down as much as we 
wanted to, but we still thought we won the case. Jury stays out like 12 days or 
more, and they’re hopelessly deadlocked. But they end up convicting an innocent 
man.

And it was all of the things we didn’t see that took place which caused that 
defeat. Mr. Pratt would always say, "They are out to get me." And I would 
always say, "Well, who do you mean by 'they'? What do you mean by 'they'? Who 
is this 'they'?" And of course, he was right. As I said, I learned a lot from 
representing Mr. Pratt, you know, that a little paranoia is healthy, that even 
paranoid people have real enemies. And of course, he was right, that it was 
"they." It was the FBI. It was the counterintelligence program.

And Amy, how we found out this out was through the good offices, really, of 
Stuart Hanlon. In the intervening years after the conviction, through the 
Freedom of Information Act, we were able to find out a number of things, that 
this man, Julius Butler, who was the star witness for the prosecution, who got 
on the stand and said that Mr. Pratt confessed to him, and was asked by me, 
"Are you now, have you ever been, an informant for the FBI or any other 
agency?" And he said, "No." He said, "No," unequivocally "no." He lied. At that 
point, he said that he informed 33 times. And, in fact, he was an informant for 
the LAPD and the L.A. County DA’s office. He was their confidential informant. 
They had done that. They had wiretapped our phones. They had informants in the 
defense environs, meaning that somewhere in our offices they knew everything we 
were going to do. They had failed to give us Brady material, that is, 
exculpatory material, where the husband of this lady who was shot had 
positively identified two other people. They kept that from us. They did all 
these things in an effort to neutralize—which meant kill, destroy, lock up 
forever—Geronimo Pratt, at the behest of J. Edgar Hoover.

AMY GOODMAN: Geronimo, before you were set free, 26 years and seven months 
after you went to prison, you were in solitary for eight years.

GERONIMO JI-JAGA PRATT: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: We can say that, but what does that mean? What is life like in 
solitary? Where were you kept?

GERONIMO JI-JAGA PRATT: Well, I was kept in the hole in San Quentin and Folsom. 
I started in the hole in Dallas, Texas, where I was busted, and then on to the 
holes in the Los Angeles County jail, which is like nightmares, when you’re 
talking about the holes in Texas and L.A. County, the old county jail, and then 
on to the holes in state prisons. But what it means is that this country 
tortures people. And right now, Hugo Pinell is going into his 27th year in the 
hole. Woodfox and Wallace and King, who are in Angola State Prison in 
Louisiana, are going into their 23rd year—year—in the hole. So, when you’re 
talking about eight years in the hole, and you look at this ongoing today, it’s 
hard for me to even talk about those eight years because it’s happening right 
now.

AMY GOODMAN: How many hours a day are you kept in this single cell?

GERONIMO JI-JAGA PRATT: Twenty-four hours a day. And then, after the second 
year, it became 23 and a half. They would let you out for half an hour.

AMY GOODMAN: To those who say that the system has proved that it works by, 
ultimately, you being exonerated, what do you say?

GERONIMO JI-JAGA PRATT: I say that that’s not a—that’s the evidence to the 
contrary, that it doesn’t work too well. All of my—seven years of my twenties, 
every minute of my thirties, every second of my forties were taken away from 
me. If that’s a system working, then I think something’s wrong with your 
thinking.

AMY GOODMAN: Geronimo ji-Jaga, born Elmer Pratt, speaking in the studios of 
WBAI with Juan Gonzalez and me, along with one of his attorneys, the late 
Johnnie Cochran. Yes, Johnnie Cochran, of O.J. fame, said that this case, the 
case of Geronimo ji-Jaga, was the most important of his life, and the happiest 
day was the day that he was released.

Also in that studio that day and joining us today from San Francisco is 
Geronimo ji-Jaga’s friend and former attorney Stuart Hanlon. Hanlon is a 
criminal lawyer who began working on Pratt’s case when he was a law student and 
stayed for 23 years until Pratt won his freedom in ’97.

And we’re joined on the phone from Los Angeles by Ed Boyer, who began writing 
about Pratt’s case in the early ’90s for the Los Angeles Times, where he was a 
reporter for 20 years, now retired.

We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Stuart Hanlon, let’s go to you first. The 
news of the death of Geronimo ji-Jaga—you remained his friend to the end. He 
died in Tanzania. He was living there?

STUART HANLON: Right. He died—he had just—I think he had left about three weeks 
before from Louisiana, and he had a great trip out here in California. And he 
seemed terrific. And it was a real shock, obviously. He just had such a great 
time when he was out in California with his daughter, seeing me and some other 
people. But, you know, life is short.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, first, our condolences to you and to his family, who he was 
living with in Tanzania. In a nutshell, describe this case. And especially for 
young people, describe what COINTELPRO is, the counterintelligence program, and 
how a Reagan-appointed attorney—a Reagan-appointed judge ultimately overturned 
the conviction of Geronimo ji-Jaga, the jury never having known that the person 
who pointed the finger at Geronimo ji-Jaga falsely was a police and FBI 
informant.

STUART HANLON: I think the place to start is the question that you guys asked 
Geronimo years ago: do you think it proved the system works because you won? 
And Johnnie, at one point—it’s one of the few differences he and I had, and he 
said the same system that locked up Geronimo let him free. Well, the system 
doesn’t work. And if it took—as Geronimo pointed out, it took 27 years of his 
life to free an innocent man.

And what people should understand, and which I think we kind of understood back 
then but not to the extent it was proven, is that our government and your state 
government, because it is the FBI with the president, local law enforcement in 
Los Angeles, district attorneys, conspired to convict somebody and lock them up 
and have them face the death penalty, because of their political beliefs and 
affiliations, that back in the '60s and early ’70s the Panthers were considered 
by J. Edgar Hoover and many others, especially in the white community, the 
number one threat to the safety of America. And imagine that, that we felt that 
a group of young African Americans, probably less than a thousand throughout 
the country, were the number one threat to our internal safety. And because of 
that, these law enforcement people and judges and district attorneys felt that 
the ends justified the means to get rid of them, by any means necessary. And 
we've learned that Fred Hampton was murdered, another Panther, in Chicago, and 
Geronimo was framed.

And people say, "How do you know he was framed? It was just some technicality." 
And I think the best image is that Julio Butler was asked by Johnnie on a 
number of occasions, "Were you an informant for any agency?" And he said, over 
and over, "No." And as it turned out, and I think what got Judge Dickey, is 
that he was an informant not just for the FBI, but for the L.A. Police 
Department and, finally, for the L.A. district attorney’s office. And these 
three agencies sat in court, because the FBI was there, and let this man lie 
and commit perjury to convict somebody. That’s not a technicality. That’s a 
breakdown of our criminal justice system. That’s the highest level of people 
involved letting someone commit perjury because they don’t like him and like 
his beliefs.

And I think the last question you asked, Amy—how does this—what does this say 
to people today, young people, like Geronimo and I were 47 years ago? And even 
Johnnie was pretty young back then. That paranoia is healthy, that now our new 
enemy may not be the Black Panther Party or African-American groups, but the 
new enemy could be Mideastern people or Muslims. And we demonize them as the 
Panthers were demonized, and then we justify trials without juries, trial 
without—you know, in military courts. We justify setting up military courts in 
Cuba, in Guantánamo. We justify all these things in the name of protecting our 
country. And what we don’t understand is our country falls apart when we do 
these things. And the legal system falls apart when we let these things happen. 
And that’s the ultimate—not personal story of Geronimo, but the political 
story, I think.

AMY GOODMAN: One of the remarkable things is that the FBI was so closely 
monitoring Elmer Pratt, Geronimo ji-Jaga, as leader of the Black Panther—one of 
the leaders of the Black Panther movement, that they had repeated wiretaps of 
him. They knew where he was, didn’t they? That night, for example, when 
Caroline Olsen was killed on the tennis court, this young woman who, with her 
husband, had gone to play tennis?

STUART HANLON: Well, you know, we were—Geronimo, when he was here, he and I 
were looking through old boxes of COINTELPRO documents. There were thousands 
and thousands just on his case. And I just recently, after Geronimo died, 
talked to an investigator who first found the wiretaps. Investigators and an 
ex-FBI agent, Wesley Swearingen, found the wiretaps. And by the time we got to 
the case, they had been destroyed. But the FBI followed Geronimo every second, 
almost, of his life, and they knew he was in Oakland at the time of the 
homicide. And when we started litigating this, rather than turning it over, for 
the first time any could remember FBI wiretaps disappeared. And of course they 
knew where he was. It didn’t matter what the truth was, you see, because he was 
the bad guy, and the truth had to take second place, even in the courtroom. But 
yeah, Amy, they certainly knew where he was, and they knew what he was about, 
and as did many other Panthers. I mean, they knew where they all were. It was 
amazing the amount of time, money and effort was put into monitoring this small 
group of political activists.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re also, in addition to Stuart Hanlon, joined by Ed Boyer, 
longtime Los Angeles Times reporter, now retired, but he did write the piece on 
Geronimo ji-Jaga when he died on Thursday. Ed, talk about how you first came to 
this story. Your reporting was instrumental ultimately in having Geronimo 
ji-Jaga exonerated and freed.

ED BOYER: Well, Amy, I saw a very short story in the L.A. Times towards the end 
of the week pointing out that Jim McCloskey, who runs Centurion Ministries, was 
was getting involved and investigating the case. And that was my first entrée, 
because McCloskey had just had a successful case in Los Angeles County. 
Clarence Chance and, I believe, Benny Powell, they were released after 17 years 
in prison. So I began reading our old clips. And what I found amazing was that 
going back to 1979, from Freedom of Information requests, they turned up all of 
this evidence showing that Julius Butler had been an informant. And during 
Geronimo’s original trial, his prosecutor said, "This case boils down to does 
the jury believe Julius Butler? If they believe Butler, the case is over." So 
they built their whole case around Butler. And less than seven years 
afterwards, there was all this Freedom of Information material showing that 
Butler had lied that long ago. And that’s when I began reporting. And it was 
stunning to me to learn that Butler was chairman of the board of one of the 
most prominent and one of the most outstanding African-American congregations 
in Los Angeles, First AME Church. So I began my reporting there.

AMY GOODMAN: And talk about what you uncovered through this period and how 
ultimately Geronimo ji-Jaga was freed.

ED BOYER: Well, I think he was ultimately freed because of Stuart Hanlon and 
Johnnie Cochran. The very people who had run him as an informant sat there 
during the habeas corpus hearing and pointed out, yes, he was my informant in 
this circumstance and this circumstance. They detailed, chapter and verse, how 
he had been their informant. There was no getting around it at that point.

But I just continued to report. I found one of the original jurors, who told me 
that had she and at least two other jurors, had they known that this guy was an 
informant, they never would have voted for conviction. And the thing that 
turned them, however, was that there was this odd situation with a Polaroid 
photograph. I talked to Cochran about this, and Stuart probably talked to him 
more than I did, that this photograph was kind of throwaway evidence. Witnesses 
had described Pratt as—had described the shooter, rather, as clean-shaven. But 
Pratt had always had a goatee. And towards the end of the trial, my 
understanding is Johnnie introduced this Polaroid photo of him with a goatee, 
and he could not have grown that between the time of the murder in December of 
’68 and Christmas of ’68, when the photo was taken. The prosecution came right 
back with an expert from Polaroid saying the film used in this photograph was 
not even available until some six months later. And that was very damaging, 
according to the juror I spoke to.

But I just continued to find people who were involved, continued reporting the 
story, whatever little leads I could. I mean, this is how I met Stuart Hanlon. 
And I got an education from him, of course.

AMY GOODMAN: Stuart Hanlon, can you talk about the judge who ultimately 
overturned the conviction?

STUART HANLON: Judge Dickey—you know, we were in Los Angeles, a bunch of 
lawyers. It was Johnnie and me and a bunch of other people—Mark Rosenbaum of 
the ACLU, Julie Drous in San Francisco, Robert Garcia. It was a lot—and we 
thought we’d get a liberal judge in L.A. And the whole judge—the whole bench 
recused themselves, because, like I said, we can’t hear the case because the 
ex-DA who we were attacking was now a judge. So we got sent to Orange County, 
and everybody said, "Oh, you’re behind the orange curtain. You’re finished." 
We’re going to get—and then we get this Republican judge appointed by Reagan, 
and we thought we were over. And what we didn’t understand is we found a true 
conservative who believed in the Constitution. And every time we walked into 
court, we had to pledge allegiance to the flag, which was unusual in 
courthouses at that point. But it set a tone of we were going to follow the 
rules.

And I think he was really moved by the evidence. I think Johnnie Cochran had an 
incredible presence in that courtroom. And Judge Dickey was offended at the 
deepest place as a good judge can be at how justice was turned on its head. The 
things Ed was talking about, that these cops came in and this young 
investigator came in for the DA, and they proved Butler was an informant. I 
mean, the DA said, the judge said, "I didn’t know"—this Judge Richard 
Kalustian, who was the DA. And then this young investigator came in and said, 
"Here’s our informant file from 1970. And Julius Butler, I found it by looking 
under B." And you could see in the courtroom how it just fell apart. And it 
wasn’t just Butler. There were so many other things that showed Pratt was 
innocent. But by the end, I was watching last night a video of Geronimo getting 
bail, and Johnnie said, "How that $1,000 for each year? Let’s set it at 
$25,000." And Judge Dickey literally had tears in his eyes when he granted it. 
He was moved by Geronimo, this ex-Vietnam vet. And the proof that he was framed 
by the country, Dickey believed it. I think it shook the judge to his core to 
see what had occurred.

I just want to say one thing, Amy, in terms of what Ed did. It was amazing, the 
media. Ed and another reporter from the Times before Ed, Austin Scott, they 
made this a national story, you know? They made this something that couldn’t go 
away. And, you know, the power of the press and what Ed Boyer did, and Austin 
Scott, was truly amazing in moving Geronimo’s case forward.

AMY GOODMAN: And Johnnie Cochran, of course, who is known by everyone for 
representing O.J. Simpson, said it was this case that was his most important 
case, that he would not rest until Geronimo ji-Jaga was free. Why was this so 
important to Johnnie? He was his court-appointed attorney, is that right?

STUART HANLON: Right. Because Johnnie, you know, through all the fancy suits 
and ties and O.J., was ultimately a man who truly believed in justice. And I 
got to know him really well in this case. And Johnnie Cochran, as a DA—he was a 
DA for about four years under Van de Kamp—would always write parole letters for 
Geronimo on DA stationery and got in trouble. He believed Geronimo was 
innocent. And that meant so much to him. And he always said, and it was true, 
this case meant so much more to him than any other case. And one of the really 
amazing sights at Johnnie’s funeral, there were so many dignitaries 
and—"dignitary" is the wrong word, but so many well-known people—and everybody 
wanted to hear one person speak. And, you know, Johnnie, wherever he was, did, 
too. And that was Geronimo Pratt. And Geronimo was eloquent, and he was the key 
speaker at Johnnie’s funeral, because those two were joined at the hip, not 
only coming from Louisiana, but as African-American men and their search for 
justice from different directions. Johnnie, it was the happiest day I ever saw, 
all of us, when Geronimo walked out of prison.

AMY GOODMAN: And we’re going to go to that moment. Stuart Hanlon, thanks so 
much for being with us, and thank you to Ed Boyer for all of your work and for 
being with us this morning, retired Los Angeles Times reporter, as we turn now 
to that day, June 10th, 1997, amidst loud cheers from his family and 
supporters, former Black Panther Geronimo ji-Jaga Pratt walking out of a Santa 
Monica, California, courtroom after a judge released him on $25,000 bail, just 
12 days after reversing his 1972 murder conviction. This came within an audio 
report from KPFK in Los Angeles. This is Geronimo ji-Jaga Pratt speaking upon 
his release.

GERONIMO JI-JAGA PRATT: I just wanted to thank you from the bottom of my heart 
for your fair and courageous ruling and assure you that any further proceedings 
in this case, I will be the first one here, because I’ve been trying to resolve 
the merits of this case for all of these years, to find out who killed Mrs. 
Olsen, not any technicalities to try to put it off. And I am so happy that 
you’ve given me the chance to finally expose the truth about who killed Mrs. 
Olsen. And you can rest assured that I will adhere to every order and every 
instruction that this court indicates for me to follow. And that’s my word as a 
Vietnam vet and as a man.

AMY GOODMAN: That was Geronimo ji-Jaga Pratt, June 10th, 1997, when he was 
freed by a California judge after serving more than a quarter of a century in 
prison. He died at the age of 63 in Tanzania last Thursday.

                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                        

Original Page: 
http://www.democracynow.org/seo/2011/6/6/former_black_panther_leader_and_political?skip_mobile=1

Shared from Read It Later

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en.

Reply via email to