After 40 Years, the Complete Pentagon Papers
by SAM ROBERTS and MICHAEL COOPER, truth-out.org
June 8th 2011
It may be a first in the annals of government secrecy: Declassifying documents
to mark the anniversary of their leak to the press. But that is what will
happen Monday, when the federal government plans to finally release the secret
government study of the Vietnam War known as the Pentagon Papers 40 years after
it was first published by The New York Times.
At first blush, it sounds like the release of one of the worst-kept secrets in
history — finally unlocking the barn door four decades after the horses bolted.
The study, after all, has already been published by The Times and other
newspapers, resulting in a landmark First Amendment decision by the Supreme
Court. It has been released in book form more than once. But it turns out that
those texts have been incomplete: When all 7,000 pages are released Monday,
officials say, the study can finally be read in its original form.
That it took until the era of WikiLeaks for the government to declassify the
Pentagon Papers struck some participants as, to say the least, curious.
“It’s absurd,” said Daniel Ellsberg, the former RAND Corporation analyst who
worked on the report and later provided it to The Times. He said Tuesday that
the report should not have been secret even in 1971, when newspapers first
published it, adding: “The reasons are very clearly domestic political reasons,
not national security at all. The reasons for the prolonged secrecy are to
conceal the fact that so much of the policy making doesn’t bear public
examination. It’s embarrassing, or even incriminating.”
When Mr. Ellsberg first leaked the study, he had to take it volume by volume
out of a safe in his office and ferry it to a small advertising company owned
by the girlfriend of a colleague who had Xerox machine. Page by page, they
copied it in all-night sessions. Now the National Archives and Records
Administration will scan it and — behold — it will be online quickly.
Leslie H. Gelb, the president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, who
was the director of the task force that wrote the report, said he was surprised
it had remained officially classified all these years, after so much of it had
been made public. “It should have been declassified a long, long time ago,” he
said.
But the secrecy has persisted. Timothy Naftali, the director of the Richard
Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, said that when he recently put together
an exhibit on Watergate, he wanted to display just the blue cover of the
Pentagon Papers report. “I was told that the cover was classified,” he said,
adding that he was astounded.
There is intrigue even in the release itself. Archivists touched off a new
round of feverish speculation when they originally announced that 11
never-before-published words of the 7,000-page report would remain redacted all
these years later, only to reverse themselves and announce Tuesday that the 11
words would be published after all.
So what were the mysterious 11 words?
Archivists originally joked that they would hold a Mad Libs contest, to see who
could guess them. But even though the 11 words will be published after all,
they have not said what they were — sparking a bit of a guessing game. Thomas
S. Blanton, the director of the National Security Archive at George Washington
University, said he guessed the words had something to do with intelligence
capabilities, or references to people who are still alive who had been sources,
or North Vietnamese diplomats.
Get Truthout in your inbox every day! Click here to sign up for free updates.
“The criticism of their redacting the 11 words in the first place is that it’s
self-defeating,” Mr. Blanton said. “You’re just flagging them for everyone to
identify what they are.”
The bigger question is what new material will be made public for the first
time. Several archivists who have seen the complete report declined invitations
to repeat history and leak the full version of the Pentagon Papers to The
Times. But there are some indications of what will be in it.
Until now, the complete text of the report — officially known as the Report of
the O.S.D. Vietnam Task Force — has been as elusive to researchers as a clean
copy of Hamlet has been to generations of Shakespeare scholars. The version Mr.
Ellsberg provided to the press was incomplete. A book published by Beacon
Press, based on a copy from Senator Mike Gravel, Democrat of Alaska, had
missing sections. And a version published by the government was heavily
redacted.
When Mr. Ellsberg originally leaked the Pentagon Papers, he did so because he
wanted to stop the Vietnam War — so he left out sections about peace
negotiations with North Vietnam. “I omitted them because I thought that Nixon
would use the release as an excuse for breaking off negotiations with North
Vietnam,” he said in an interview. “I frankly didn’t want to give him that
excuse.”
Those sections about the negotiations had been declassified for years. But they
will now appear in the context in which they were first written, along with
several volumes that have not been published, including a section on the United
States training the Vietnamese national army, a statistical survey of the war
from 1965 to 1967 and some supporting documents.
Mr. Gelb said he thought the depth of the reports had been exaggerated over
time, and noted that his team was extremely limited in what it was able to draw
on to produce them.
“They are almost catch-as-catch-can studies based on available documents,” he
said. “This thing was not meant to be in any sense a definitive history, or
even a definitive bureaucratic history. It was just a history put together by
very smart guys on the run.”
But Mr. Ellsberg said there were still plenty of lessons to be drawn.
“The rerelease of the Pentagon Papers is very timely, if anyone were to read
it,” he said.
He said they demonstrate the wisdom of giving war-making powers to Congress — a
power that he lamented has been increasingly usurped by the executive branch.
“It seems to me that what the Pentagon Papers really demonstrated 40 years ago
was the price of that practice,” he said. “Which is that letting a small group
of men in secret in the executive branch make these decisions — initiate them
secretly, carry them out secretly and manipulate Congress, and lie to Congress
and the public as to why they’re doing it and what they’re doing — is a recipe
for, a guarantee of Vietnams and Iraqs and Libyas, and in general foolish,
reckless, dangerous policies.”
Mr. Ellsberg said he wished more people would come forward to release
information that could stop these wars, praising Pfc. Bradley E. Manning, the
military intelligence analyst who is jailed on charges that he leaked a trove
of government files to WikiLeaks.
“If he did what he’s accused of, then he’s my hero, because I’ve been waiting
for somebody to do that for 40 years,” Mr. Ellsberg said. “And no one has.”
Original Page:
http://www.truth-out.org/after-40-years-complete-pentagon-papers/1307554602
Shared from Read It Later
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en.
