Would ‘Hanoi Jane’ be an enemy combatant today? 




http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20111002/news/710029767/ 




10/3/2011 

By Chuck Goudie 




Jane Fonda was a traitor to America in 1972 and still is if you talk to many 
Vietnam War veterans. 

Judging by the airstrike against American terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki, Fonda 
should consider herself lucky to be alive today. 

“Hanoi Jane,” as she is still known in VFW halls and American Legion clubs 
across the country, was one squeeze of a trigger away from being an enemy 
combatant. 

In July of ‘72, as the war in Southeast Asia raged, the activist-actress 
accepted an invitation to visit Hanoi, the capital of North Vietnam. 

The U.S. was fighting a war against North Vietnam and tens of thousands of our 
soldiers had already died in terrible combat. 

Fonda appeared with North Vietnamese leaders and made numerous broadcasts on 
the communist Radio Hanoi during which she called U.S. officials “war 
criminals.” Her well-publicized trip infuriated military officers, politicians, 
and regular Americans, even some who opposed the war. 

It was no different than if Donna Reed or some other well-known actress had 
gone to Berlin during World War II and denounced the United States. 

The most memorable anti-American act by Fonda while in Hanoi was her photo 
opportunity sitting on an anti-aircraft gun. There was Fonda, wearing an enemy 
helmet, seen pointing the gun to the sky — where U.S. pilots were flying 
missions and some had been shot down, captured or killed. 

Lucky for Fonda that she just sat there and didn’t have a twitch in her trigger 
finger. 

Had Hanoi Jane actually fired that gun, she could have rightly been considered 
an enemy combatant, having crossed the line from just a hair-brained, misguided 
protester and enemy puppet. While there were no drones available back then, she 
might have found herself in the way of a 105 howitzer blast or too close to a 
“daisy cutter” bomb. 

Maybe Anwar al-Awlaki cut class when Vietnam was covered in American history 
classes during his years in New Mexico, where he was born, and in Colorado and 
California, where he attended college. Al-Awlaki, a U.S. citizen, was a strong 
Islamic advocate and organizer back then and loudly outspoken against American 
policies. 

He also served as an Imam at several mosques in the late 1990s and befriended 
men who would later become attackers on Sept. 11. Authorities suspect that 
al-Awlaki’s lectures, preaching violence and hatred, encouraged them to become 
martyrs. 

In 2005 though, when he moved to his parents’ homeland of Yemen to work as a 
college lecturer, al-Awlaki crossed the line from preacher to participant, a 
decision that effectively ended his American citizenship and ultimately his 
life. 

According to federal authorities, he began plotting kidnappings of U.S. 
officials overseas and attacks on Americans abroad and here at home. Working 
with al-Qaida operatives, al-Awlaki had a hand in the planning or execution of 
the Fort Hood, Tex. shooting attack by a Muslim Army psychiatrist; the 
Christmas Day “underwear bomber” who tried to blow up a Detroit-bound jetliner; 
and the ink-cartridge bombs in packages addressed to Chicago-area synagogues 
that were placed on cargo jets bound for the U.S. 

He also admitted to being a traitor and an instigator and plotter of violence 
against Americans. Had he stopped at rhetoric and stupid behavior such as Jane 
Fonda’s photo-op with the NVA artillery battery, he could have gone on forever. 
Anti-American speech is protected. Becoming a soldier for the enemy in the War 
on Terror or any other war isn’t. 

He might even have been able to continue working on Inspire, al-Qaida’s online 
English magazine that aims to radicalize American Muslims and encourage 
violence. One issue last fall showed Chicago as a backdrop for an article about 
“one-man jihad,” and urged Islamists to stage attacks whenever they wanted, not 
waiting for orders from overseas. 

Jane Fonda never pulled the trigger on the enemy gun she mounted that day in 
1972. She has apologized for it time and again. Says it was a terrible mistake, 
thoughtless and cruel and blah, blah, blah. 

Of course, to this day, many veterans don’t believe her and think she should’ve 
been charged as a traitor — or worse. Some still show up to protest when she 
makes appearances. A few years ago one vet, harboring decades of anger, spit in 
her face. 

But at least she’s around to apologize and try to make good on what she did 
wrong. 

Al-Awlaki may have been the first American who was killed in this manner. But 
because of his recruiting skills, it’s likely he won’t be the last. 

. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sixties-L" group.
To post to this group, send email to sixties-l@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sixties-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sixties-l?hl=en.

Reply via email to