Me, too. I used Craig's method and got diddly squat, even though all I was claiming was $78K.
--- Darren & Sharon <[email protected]> wrote: > I they are so happy to refund up to half a mil, etc, > how come all I got was > a $5K ff fine? -- S > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Glenn > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > John has talked to the irs and he has seen > refunds approaching half a > > mill. He thinks Craig's approach is the best. > > GHG > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Darren & Sharon <[email protected]> > > *To:* [email protected] ; [email protected] > > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2009 7:30 PM > > *Subject:* Re: Question on 1099 OID > > > > I personally know someone who got back $22K from > OID'ing his three > > credit cards (the limit on the cards, not the amt > outstanding). He also > > typed them very professionally and got the three > credit card company's TIN's > > on each form as well... -- S > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:41 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> My Question is has anybody seen someones elses ck > from Treasury? using > >> a 1099 oid or?Phil > >> > >> On May 29 2008, 5:15 pm, "Darren & Sharon" > <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Umm... I'd be really cautious about that. > Patriots are having a very > >> > difficult time accessing the exemption, and > some are getting prosecuted > >> for > >> > attempting to pass fraudulent instruments. I > sure would NOT spend > >> thousands > >> > of dollars on it! Personally. You are > definitely being overcharged > >> and > >> > the party charging that price is gambling on > your > >> inexperience/ignorance. > >> > You need to spend more time looking into the > Accepted for Value method > >> > before you have someone write you up some bogus > bond that you can't ever > >> do > >> > anything with anyways! What would you do with > it once you have it? How > >> > would you "negotiate" it??? Banks won't accept > it, I can guarantee you, > >> and > >> > they might even call in the local overzealous > authorities. Especially > >> for > >> > that amount of value. A bank can report > ANYONE, wrong, right, or > >> > indifferent, and the local authorities take > their word for it. No, not > >> a > >> > good idea at all, in my humble opinion. > >> > > >> > Not trying to be a downer or anything, but see > this link: > >> > http://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/statreg/fraud/fraud_bogussightdr... > >> > > >> > That's why we like the OID method, since it has > the IRS trot on over and > >> nab > >> > our exemption for us! Go to our sister sites, > yahoo groups > >> > "RedemptionByMethod" and "UCCRedemption." Lots > of great advice there! > >> As > >> > far as I know, the OID method is NOT doing > anything that can be > >> construed as > >> > fraudulent. But make sure to check with your > attorney first (wink, > >> wink). > >> > > >> > -- S > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:52 PM, SVO > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hello folks, > >> > > >> > > I'm new here and found this thread while > doing a search on 'Tom > >> > > Schultz'. I need help and advice very badly. > I am not in any kind of > >> > > eminent emergency. But I have been presented > with an offer for > >> > > someone to do a $300 million indemnity bond > for me. I know enough to > >> > > be dangerous, but I want to know enough to be > right. As Davy Crockett > >> > > once said 'Make sure your're right, then go > ahead'. I do not want to > >> > > spend couple of thousand bucks for a bond and > an offset bond and then > >> > > not know how to use it, or if it is even > legit. I have pieces to the > >> > > 'puzzle', but they are like having all the > squares on a flow chart and > >> > > not knowing how to draw the connecting lines. > I'm wondering if there > >> > > is anyone out there who would be willing to > mentor me, or know someone > >> > > who would? I don't even know who to trust. > Not sure about Sam > >> > > Kennedy, Shrout, Keating, Elvick, et al. Can > someone help me with > >> > > some real truth and guidance here. I don't > want to pass up a good > >> > > thing, but I'm 58, a W2 worker, have kids and > a family and lovely wife > >> > > and don't want to end up behind bars. My > email is > >> > > svanos(nospam)@fuse.net (just remove the > 'nospam' part and you got > >> > > it). > >> > > >> > > On May 2, 7:15 pm, "Darren & Sharon" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > Well that's bull that the 2008 OID's aren't > out yet since I ordered > >> them > >> > > > from irs.gov and they arrived at my PO box > a couple weeks ago... I > >> just > >> > > > re-verified it with my own eyes. I'll pop > a few in the mail to you > >> if > >> > > you > >> > > > send me your address. > >> > > >> > > > -- Sharon > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:39 AM, brad > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > > > I have a couple of presentments mailed to > me with coupons and 0 > >> amt on > >> > > > > the coupons. These letters have a 300 > penalty for private use. I > >> have > >> > > > > printed a money order on the coupons and > the envelopes the two > >> offers > >> > > > > came in. Here is my problem. Where do I > get 2008 1099OID's? I have > >> > > > > called 2 separate IRS form offices and > each have said the 2008's > >> are > >> > > > > not out yet. I placed orders at both > offices anyway as I needed > >> some > >> > > > > past year forms. > >> > > > > Any suggestions? Should I just change > the number on say a 2007 > >> form > >> > > > > to an 8? > >> > > > > Don't really know what elsed to do. The > other thing I thought was > >> to > >> > > > > send what I can do with a cover letter > explaining I don't have a > >> 2008 > >> > > > > and would they kindly fill one out. > >> > > > > Any other thoughts or if someone has a > few 2008 forms (which the > >> IRS > >> > > > > has said are not yet in print and they > never lie) would they > >> kindly > >> > > > > contact me for a my mailing address if > they can spare them. Thanks > >> in > >> > > > > advance. > >> > > > > Brad > >> > > >> > > *** DISCLAIMER: Free Speech Only. Not > intended to be construed as > >> legal, > >> > > medical, financial, or other advice. Without > Prejudice, === message truncated ===
